A study on correlation and path co-efficient analysis was conducted on eleven F 1 generation derived from crosses between aromatic and non-aromatic parental landraces genotypes. The results showed that high standard deviation was observed on head rice recovery (16.12) followed by gel consistence (13.81) and milling recovery (10.74). The results also showed that correlation between brown rice length and paddy grain width (r= 0.692); paddy grain length and brown grain length (r = 0.558); head rice recovery and milling recovery (r = 0.511) and brown rice shape and grain rice length (r = 0.404) were positive highly significant, while correlation between brown rice shape and brown rice length were negative (r = -0.497). These highly correlated characters could be used for indirect selection and improvement of grain rice quality. The path co-efficient analyses revealed a low direct and positive effect for paddy grain length on brown grain length (0.009). The direct effect of brown rice width (2.774) and brown grain shape (2.481) on brown grain length was high and positive showing that these characters have a direct effect and influence on brown grain length thus indicating their importance in grain rice quality improvement.
). Nine traits, namely number of tillers, 1000-grain weight, panicle length, number of grains per panicle, grain length, number of days to 50% flowering, and number of days to maturity were positively correlated with grain yield. Significant differences (P<0.001) were found in grain length, although 19 genotypes were greater in grain length (>7.5 mm). Faya showed the highest percentage on the whole grain (60%), in comparison with Marista (20.2%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.