Four cases of lithium-induced neurotoxicity are presented which, taken with evidence from previous reports, indicate that specific risk factors for lithium-induced neurotoxicity at normal serum levels are rapid dosage regimes, concomitant neuroleptic therapy, pre-existing EEG abnormalities, undetected cerebral pathology, organic impairment, and genetic susceptibility.

No abstract

Since the introduction of lithium therapy 30 years ago it has become a major weapon in psychiatrists' armamentarium. It is the drug of first choice for the prevention of recurrent mood disorders, and it is estimated that about one person in every thousand people in Britain receives lithium at any one time. It therefore behoves doctors to be familiar with its use. This article is not a comprehensive account of the pharmacology of lithium (for this the reader is referred to Johnson (1987) and Peet & Pratt (1993)) but concentrates on its clinical use in practice and some less well known, but important, phenomena.

1 Cardiovascular responses to intravenous prizidilol hydrochloride (SK&F 92657) 0.86 mg/kg were studied in eight supine resting healthy volunteers. Five subjects were slow and the remaining three were fast acetylators of sulphamethazine. Compared with pre-infusion values, mean resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced, while mean resting pulse rate was significantly increased at 30 min after the start of the twenty minute infusion. 2 During the 6 h study period the lowest mean ± s.e. mean systolic blood pressure (108.8 + 1.7) was recorded 30 min after the start of the infusion. This represented a mean reduction of 5.2 mmHg. Reductions in mean diastolic blood pressure were greater and of longer duration, the lowest mean value (44.8 + 2.0 mmHg) being recorded 3.5 h after the start of the infusion and representing a reduction of 18.5 mmHg from the pre-dosing value. At 6 h after the start of the infusion mean diastolic blood pressure was still significantly reduced (by 15.3 mmHg). 3 The maximum mean + s.e. mean resting pulse rate (79.3 ± 4.4 beats/min) occurred 3 h after the start of the infusion, an increase of 23.0 beats/min over the pre-infusion value. At the end of the study the pulse rate was still significantly raised (by 17.7 beats/min). 4 The left ventricular ejection fraction, evaluated in five subjects, 45 min after the start of the infusion, was not altered by prizidilol hydrochloride, but the left ventricular area decreased significantly. 5 Intravenous prizidilol hydrochloride decreases resting blood pressure and left ventricular area, increases pulse rate and has virtually no effect on left ventricular ejection fraction.

The pharmacokinetics of cilazapril and its active metabolite cilazaprilat in plasma were investigated in an open study of 13 healthy male volunteers, aged 18 to 43 years. One capsule containing 2.5 mg cilazapril was administered to each volunteer daily for 8 days. Plasma samples were obtained after the first and eighth doses. Concentrations of cilazapril, cilazaprilat and activities of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) were measured by radioenzymatic methods. For cilazapril, the values of apparent plasma clearance (about 15 l/h) and volume of distribution (around 28 l) were sufficiently high to suggest that significant pre-systemic hydrolysis to cilazaprilat occurred. There were no significant changes in these values after repeated dosing. There were small, but statistically significant, increases in mean peak concentrations, mean areas under concentration-time curves and mean trough concentrations from the first to the eighth dose. A steady state was achieved after eight doses with an accumulation of 20-30%. The mean effective half-life was approximately 9 h. Despite the accumulation of cilazaprilat in plasma, there were no significant differences in plasma ACE inhibition from the first to the eighth dose.