After stratification on initial intragastric pH into two groups, patients from both groups were randomly assigned to receive either antacids (a suspension of aluminum hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide), 30 mL every 4 h, or sucralfate, 1 g every 4 h. Continuous intragastric pH monitoring was performed in 112 patients (58 antacids, 54 sucralfate). Using predetermined criteria, colonization of stomach, oropharynx, and trachea, and the incidence of VAP were assessed. Altogether, 141 patients were included (74 receiving antacids, 67 sucralfate) and continuous intragastric pH monitoring was performed in 112 patients, with a mean of 75 h per patient. The median pH and the percentage of time with a pH < 4.0 were calculated from each measurement. No significant differences in median pH values (4.7 +/- 2.2 and 4.5 +/- 2.0 for antacids and sucralfate, respectively) were observed. Median pH values were higher in patients with gastric bacterial colonization than in noncolonized patients (5.5 +/- 2.1 and 3.3 +/- 2.0, p < 0.01), but colonization of oropharynx and trachea was not related to intragastric acidity. Thirty-one patients (22%) developed VAP, with a similar incidence in both treatment groups. In addition, antibiotic use, duration of hospitalization, and mortality rates were similar in both groups. Enteral feeding did not change intragastric acidity significantly but increased gastric colonization with Enterobacteriaceae, without influencing oropharyngeal and tracheal colonization. Antacids and sucralfate had a similar effect on intragastric acidity, colonization rates, and incidence of VAP. Intragastric acidity influenced gastric colonization but not colonization of the upper respiratory tract or the incidence of VAP. Therefore, it is unlikely that the gastropulmonary route is important for the development of VAP.

cross infection, prevention and control; respiration, artificial, adverse effects; antibiotics, administration and dosage infection control methods; pneumonia, etiology, prevention and control; intubation, intratracheal, adverse effects

Annexin A5 (AnxA5) is a protein with high affinity for phosphatidyl serine, a phospholipid exposed on the cell surface during apoptosis. This phenomenon has been used for determination of cell death after myocardial infarction. To evaluate the potential of (99m)Tc-AnxA5 for in vivo scintigraphy of apoptotic cells, the pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of two radiopharmaceuticals, (99m)Tc-(n-1-imino-4-mercaptobutyl)-AnxA5 (I-AnxA5) and (99m)Tc-(4,5-bis(thioacetamido)pentanoyl)-AnxA5 (B-AnxA5), were studied. I-AnxA5 was administered intravenously to seven patients and one healthy volunteer, and B-AnxA5 was administered to 12 patients. All patients in the pharmacokinetic study had myocardial disease. Additionally, imaging was performed in a patient with acute myocardial infarction, as well as in three patients with different malignancies. The plasma concentration, excretion and biodistribution of (99m)Tc-AnxA5 were measured, as well as levels of AnxA5 antigen. The kinetic data of both radiopharmaceuticals in plasma fitted a two-compartment model. Both preparations had similar half-lives, but a different distribution over the two compartments. Plasma levels of AnxA5 antigen showed a broad variation. Both radiopharmaceuticals accumulated in the kidney, liver and gut. B-AnxA5 was excreted significantly faster than I-AnxA5. Both compounds can be used for imaging of the head/neck region, the thorax and the extremities. B-AnxA5 has a faster clearance and a lower radiation dose. Imaging of apoptosis in the abdomen will be difficult with both radiopharmaceuticals, and especially with B-AnxA5 because of its faster appearance in the gut.

No abstract

Aims To investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of R-and S-acenocoumarol and on their combined anticoagulant activity. Methods Eight healthy male subjects completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way cross-over study. Subjects were given either omeprazole 40 mg or placebo once daily for 3 days. On day 2 of each study period, a single 10 mg oral dose of racemic acenocoumarol was administered and venous blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. A wash-out period of 2 weeks separated the two study periods. Results The pharmacokinetics of R-and S-acenocoumarol (AUC 3016±221 and 233±14 ng ml −1 h, respectively) did not change after omeprazole (AUC 2929±256and 220±18 ng ml −1 h, respectively). Anticoagulant activity (INR max 1.7±0.1) was unaffected by co-administration of omeprazole (INR max 1.7±0.1).Conclusions The short-term intake of omeprazole does not affect acenocoumarol pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. These data differ from the results of previous studies on the effect of omeprazole on warfarin, suggesting a different in vivo interaction profile of omeprazole on acenocoumarol than on warfarin. Drug interaction studies with oral anticoagulants should not be restricted to the use of warfarin.