A PCR using primers aimed at the multicopy gene coding for the small subunit rRNA and resulting in the synthesis of a 180-bp fragment was evaluated for its use in diagnosing invasive candidiasis in comparison with blood culture. With the use of a C. albicans-specific probe, ؎10 to 15 C. albicans cells are detected in 100 l of whole blood by Southern analysis. A DNase pretreatment was critical in the purification process of yeast DNA from whole blood. Omission of the DNase pretreatment decreased assay sensitivity 10-fold. PCR analysis of blood specimens collected from mice with invasive candidiasis is more sensitive than blood culture (100 versus 67%, respectively) at 72 h after intravenous (i.v.) inoculation with C. albicans. Furthermore, the intensity of the hybridization signals increased with the progression of infection. In contrast, multiple blood samples from gastrointestinally colonized mice were all negative by PCR, indicating that the PCR assay is also specific and may, therefore, make a positive contribution to the detection and follow-up of invasive candidiasis.
An immunodominant antigen with enolase enzyme activity was purified and used for the development of an assay to detect antibodies directed against this antigen in sera from patients with either invasive candidiasis or Candida colonization. The Au enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay established with the Candida enolase antigen was able to discriminate significantly between invasive candidiasis and colonization in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient groups of patients. The test had a sensitivity of 50%Y and a specificity of 86% in the immunocompetent patient group. In the immunodeficient patient group, a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 78% were established. Antibody levels determined by a counterimmunoelectrophoresis assay with the same set of sera resulted in a better sensitivity for sera from the immunocompetent patient group but a lower specificity, i.e., 80 and 29%o, respectively. The counterimmunoelectrophoresis assay of sera from the immunodeficient patient group was not able to discriminate significantly between invasive candidiasis and colonization. With the use of more serum from each patient, the sensitivity of the antibody detection assays increased, while the specificity was maintained. The increase, however, was not statistically significant. Combining the results of the antibody assays with antigen titers obtained by the Cand-Tec assay did not improve the predictive value with respect to invasive candidiasis, as determined by multivariance regression analysis. Furthermore, it was demonstrated by performance of Western blots (immunoblots) that sera from patients as well as a rabbit antiserum cross-reacted with the Candida enolase and baker's yeast enolase enzyme. However, by tandem crossed immunoelectrophoresis it was demonstrated that the antibodies were directed toward different epitopes of the antigen.
When a diagnosis of invasive candidiasis has been made, treatment with toxic fungicidal agents is inevitable. The crucial decision of when to stop such treatment is difficult to make, because cultures are often negative despite ongoing invasive candidiasis and can therefore not be used as a reliable parameter of effective therapy. In the present study, the use of PCR in monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of antifungal treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was evaluated by using neutropenic mice with systemic candidiasis. Blood cultures of infected mice treated with different doses of liposomal amphotericin B were only positive at the early onset of the infection process and became sterile within 3 days; this was true even with mice treated with 1 mg of liposomal amphotericin B per kg of body weight that experienced a relapse of infection 14 days later. A significant correlation between presence of Candida albicans in the kidneys and PCR results obtained with blood was demonstrated. Thus, PCR results obtained with blood samples correlated well with the therapeutic efficacy of antifungal treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.