The mechanisms underlying central neuropathic pain are poorly understood. Pain inhibitory mechanisms including sertononergic and norepinephrine systems may be dysfunctional. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial we evaluated the effects of duloxetine on pain relief (spontaneous pain and evoked pain), tolerability, health status, and quality of life in patients with central pain related to cerebrovascular lesions or spinal cord lesions. At baseline and eight weeks following start of treatment subjects were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy: pain intensity (primary efficacy variable), quantitative sensory testing, health status and quality of life (secondary efficacy variables). Forty-eight patients received escalating doses of either duloxetine (60 and 120mg/day) or matching placebo capsules. In both groups, patients started with 1 capsule per day. If pain relief was insufficient, patients were titrated to a higher dose. A trend towards a decrease in mean pain score after eight weeks was observed for duloxetine treatment (p=0.056). Duloxetine alleviated dynamic (p=0.035) and cold allodynia (p<0.001) significantly better than placebo. Tactile pain and pressure pain thresholds did not improve significantly. The duloxetine group showed a significant improvement for the bodily pain domain of the SF36 (p=0.035). No significant differences were observed in the other domains of the SF36, the Pain Disability Index, and the EQ-5D. While this trial showed no significant effect on pain intensity, duloxetine revealed a biologic effect. It would be worthwhile to suspend our judgement and to perform more studies to evaluate the role of duloxetine in modulation of the symptoms of central neuropathic pain.

No abstract

No abstract

Historically, metformin was withheld before surgery for fear of metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Currently, however, this risk is deemed to be low and guidelines have moved towards the continuation of metformin. We hypothesized that continuing metformin peri-operatively would lower postoperative serum glucose level without an effect on plasma lactate levels. We performed a single-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus scheduled for non-cardiac surgery and continued (MF+ group) or withheld (MF- group) metformin before surgery. The main outcome measures were the differences in peri-operative plasma glucose and lactate levels. We randomized 70 patients (37 MF+ group and 33 MF- group) with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Postoperative glucose levels were similar in the MF+ and the MF- groups (8.2 ± 1.8 vs 8.3 ± 2.3 mmol/L P = .95) Although preoperative lactate levels were slightly higher in the MF+ group compared with the MF- group (1.5 vs 1.2 mmol/L; P = .02), the postoperative lactate levels were not significantly different (1.2 vs 1.0 mmol/L; P = .18). In conclusion, continuation of metformin during elective non-cardiac surgery does not improve glucose control or raise lactate levels to a clinically relevant degree.

No abstract