Poor dyspnea perception might be a risk factor for developing asthma exacerbations. We investigated whether severe asthmatics with recurrent exacerbations (brittle asthma) have different dyspnea perception and sputum cells compared with equally severe, but stable asthmatics, or patients with mild steroid-naive asthma. Fifteen brittle asthmatics (13 female, median age 28 yr [range, 20 to 47 yr]), 15 matched severe-stable asthmatics (14 female, median age 26 yr [range, 17 to 52 yr]), and 11 mild asthmatics (8 female, median age 25 yr [range, 19 to 43 yr]) underwent inhalation tests with methacholine (MCh), and hypertonic saline combined with sputum induction. Dyspnea was assessed by Borg and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), plotted against the percent fall in FEV1, and expressed as the slope of the regression line (Slope-Borg and Slope-VAS). The brittle and stable asthmatics had poorer perception than patients with mild asthma (Slope-Borg [p = 0.036], Slope-VAS [p < 0.001] for MCh). In patients with brittle asthma the perception was less as compared with severe-stable asthma (Slope-Borg for MCh: p = 0.05). In the severe asthmatics there was an inverse correlation between sputum eosinophilia and Slope-Borg and Slope-VAS (R = -0.55, p = 0. 002 and R = -0.37, p = 0.049), whereas this correlation was a positive one in the mild asthmatics (R = 0.79, p = 0.012 and R = 0. 67, p = 0.05). In conclusion, patients with severe asthma, particularly those with recurrent exacerbations, have blunted perception of dyspnea, which is related to the degree of sputum eosinophilia. This suggests that increased sputum eosinophilia is an indicator of clinical instabililty, and that eosinophilic airways inflammation might affect dyspnea perception in severe asthma.

No abstract

Smoking asthmatics with a limited smoking history show a distinct pattern of airway pathology characterized by a bronchial infiltrate of CD8(+) T cells and CD68(+) macrophages, and epithelial remodelling resembling COPD-like features. This raises the hypothesis that early presence of CD8(+) T cells contributes to disease progression in smoking asthmatics.

The early asthmatic response to inhaled HDM extract is predominantly determined by non-specific airway responsiveness to methacholine or histamine, whereas the influence of the cutaneous sensitivity to HDM appears to be rather limited. Our new equations accurately predict PC(20) allergen and hence are suitable for implementation in HDM inhalation studies.

Adhesion molecule very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is implicated in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells in asthma, including eosinophils, T cells and mast cells. VLA-4 antagonists have been proposed as a new anti-inflammatory treatment modality for asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether a single inhaled dose of VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X could protect against allergen-induced changes in airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study with single inhaled doses of 3 mg of GW559090X, 500 microg of fluticasone propionate (FP) or placebo in 15 patients with mild intermittent asthma, controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists only. All patients developed a late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation during screening. Study medication was administered 30 min prior to allergen challenge. Pre-dose and 24 h post-dose PC20 methacholine and levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were determined. At the given dose, VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X did not attenuate the early asthmatic response (EAR) when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 27.2+/-3.7 and 21.9+/-3.0 respectively (P=0.33); nor the LAR: mean AUC3-8 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 98.8+/-12.9 and 94.8+/-6.8 respectively (P=0.84). However, pretreatment with FP did attenuate both EAR and LAR when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h11.6+/-3.3 (P=0.024) and mean AUC3-8 h 6.3+/-7.6 (P<0.001). None of these treatments had an effect on allergen-induced changes in airway hyper-responsiveness or eNO levels. These findings suggest that VLA-4 may not play a major role in allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.