No abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of six dental adhesives (Admira Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Fuji Bond LC, Gluma Comfort Bond, and NanoBond) applied to cell cultures.MethodsThe experiments were performed on two cell lines, rat pulp cells (RPC-C2A) and human lung fibroblasts (MRC5). Samples of the adhesives were light-cured and placed in culture medium for 24 hours. The extraction media was applied on the RPC-C2A and the MRC5 cells. Complete medium was used as a control. Cytotoxicity was evaluated with a modified sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay after 24 hours of exposure.ResultsThe cell survival of RPC-C2A cells exposed to Fuji Bond LC, NanoBond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond was 73%, 67%, 50%, 20%, 18% and 5% respectively, relative to the cell survival with the control medium. In the MRC5 cell line, the relative survival was 98%, 80%, 72%, 41%, 19% and 7% after exposure to NanoBond, Fuji Bond LC, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, ED Primer II, Admira Bond and Gluma Comfort Bond, respectively.ConclusionsDifferent types of dental adhesives showed different cytotoxic effects on cells in vitro. The self-etch adhesives were superior in terms of cytotoxicity. The different cytotoxic effects of dental adhesives should be considered when selecting an appropriate adhesive for operative restorations.

This study examined the antibacterial activities of the bonding systems Syntac, EBS and Scotchbond 1, the polyacid-modified composite resins Hytac and Compoglass, and the composite resins Tetric, Z100 and Scalp-it. They were evaluated using the cariogenic bacteria Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus salivarius, Streptococcus sorbinus and Actinomyces viscosus in vitro with a modified cylinder drop plate agar diffusion assay. All adhesives of the dentin bonding systems and the polyacid-modified composite resins exhibited various degrees of antibacterial activity against all of the test bacteria. On the contrary, composite resins did not affect bacterial growth. The data suggest that the use of these adhesives and polyacid-modified composite resins may reduce the consequences of microleakage owing to their antibacterial properties.

Clearfil Protect Bond is a new dental bonding agent recently introduced into clinical practice. It contains an antibacterial monomer that contributes to its antibacterial profile. The aim of the present study was to evaluate cytotoxic effect of Clearfil Protect Bond against three established fibroblastic cell lines, in comparison with four commonly used adhesive materials (Adper Scotchbond 1, Excite, Tyrian SPE, and One Step plus). The experiments were performed using RPC-C2A, BHK21/C13, and MRC5 cell lines. Test specimens, either cured or uncured, were placed in a culture medium and the extraction media were used as experimental material. The effect of the bonding materials was assessed by a modified sulforhodamine-B assay after 24 and 48 h of exposure. All tested agents exhibited an antiproliferative effect on cells, the effect on RPC-C2A being the most marked. Extraction media from the uncured materials were without exception highly cytotoxic. In the experiments performed using extraction medium from cured material, Clearfil Protect Bond appeared to be the least toxic material, followed by Tyrian SPE and One Step plus. Adper Scotchbond 1 and Excite exhibited the strongest cytotoxic effect. The cell survival percentage ranged between 66 and 97% for Clearfil Protect bond, 15 and 82% for Tyrian SPE, 28 and 58% for One Step plus, 2 and 28% for Excite, and 1 and 6% for Adper Scotchbond 1. Taking into consideration the limitations of an in vitro study, our results indicate that the new antibacterial dental adhesive system is suitable for clinical application.