No abstract

Introduction. Significant progress in the perinatal and intensive care therapy resulted in a meaningful increase of survival of extremely immature, and burdened with severe diseases neonates. Although infants are the patients of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, the needs of their parents should also be noticed and realized. The aim of the study was the analysis of the parents' experiences of children hospitalized in the NICU.Material. The research material comprises 39 written contributions of parents of children hospitalized in the NICU. Method. A qualitative analysis of the text was used. Quotes of parents were classified in three categories: emotions, thoughts and support. Results. Fear, happiness, joy, uncertainty, stress and shock are the most frequently emotions appearing in the parents' reports. The most frequently mentioned areas of cognitive reactions of parents include: realization of child's mortality, realizing problems of the premature birth, search for the guilty, and the reformulation of looking at the world. Parents often described support they received, but also pointed to the areas where support lacked.Conclusion: 1. As a result of intense emotions, both positive and negative tint that parents experience at birth of a premature or sick child, multidisciplinary care is necessary in order to reduce the negative effects of experienced emotions. 2. Support, including information support for parents of critically ill newborns is a key skill in the practice of doctors taking care of children hospitalized in NICU. 3. Psychological support is an essential element of the holistic care of the neonate's family.

Background Atypical or complex paediatric neurological presentations are common clinical conundrums and often remain undiagnosed despite extensive investigations. This is particularly pronounced in immunocompromised patients. Here we show that clinical metagenomics (CMg) is a valuable adjunct diagnostic tool to be used by neuro-infection multidisciplinary teams (MDTs). Methods We included patients referred to the Great Ormond Street Hospital neuro-infection MDT in whom diagnostic uncertainty remained, despite a standardised comprehensive set of investigations, and who were referred for untargeted CMg on brain tissue and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In a retrospective review, two clinicians independently assessed whether CMg in conjunction with the MDT resulted in a change of management. Findings 60 undiagnosed patients met the inclusion criteria. We detected the causative pathogen by CMg in 14/60 (23%), with 12/36 patients known to be immunocompromised. CMg results, even when negative, informed patient care, resulting in changes in clinical management in 42/57 (74%). Six patients had unexpected findings of pathogens not identified on prior samples. In four patients, the pathogen was found solely in the brain biopsy and was absent from all other specimens, including CSF. Interpretation CMg is particularly useful when conventional diagnostic techniques for meningoencephalitis are exhausted and proved to be an important diagnostic tool for immunocompromised patients. CMg provided increased reassurance against an infective aetiology prior to recommending immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment. Specialised MDTs should advocate for early brain biopsies and routine CMg in an experienced laboratory for undiagnosed complex neurological cases affecting immunocompromised patients. Funding: the authors declare no funding