Diabetes is a metabolic condition that is exponentially increasing worldwide. Current monitoring methods for diabetes are invasive, painful, and expensive. Herein, we present the first multipatient clinical trial that demonstrates clearly that tear fluid may be a valuable marker for systemic glucose measurements. The NovioSense Glucose Sensor, worn under the lower eye lid (inferior conjunctival fornix), is reported to continuously measure glucose levels in the basal tear fluid with good correlation to blood glucose values, showing clear clinical feasibility in both animals and humans. Furthermore, the polysaccharide coated device previously reported by our laboratory when worn, does not induce pain or irritation. In a phase II clinical trial, six patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus were enrolled and the capability of the device to measure glucose in the tear fluid was evaluated. The NovioSense Glucose Sensor gives a stable signal and the results correlate well to blood glucose values obtained from finger-prick measurements determined by consensus error grid analysis.

Introduction: We recently published the results of a pilot study measuring glucose in tear fluid. We now show the results of an additional 24 patients. Methods: Twenty-four subjects were recruited from Haaglanden Diabetes Centre. The patients reported in a fasting state and were given a meal with half the usual dose of insulin during the test. The device was applied under the lower eyelid. Glucose levels from capillary blood and interstitial fluid with a flash glucose measurement device were recorded every 15 minutes; the current from the tear glucose sensor was recorded continuously. The eye surface and tolerability were regularly checked. A calibration algorithm to convert tear glucose to blood values was built using a neural network regression model and validated. Results: No adverse events were attributed to the sensor coil placed under the lower eyelid. The mean absolute relative difference for the 24-patient subset was 16.7 (after 6 hours total time in the eye). The median absolute relative difference was 13.3. Compared to published data from Abbott (15.7 on day 1), the present device is comparable to Libre, considering that the device was allowed only one hour of equilibration time before the measurements were made. Conclusion: The NovioSense Tear glucose sensor measures blood glucose values with an acceptable accuracy and may become a good alternative to invasive devices.