No abstract

Large cohort studies suggest that high convective volumes associated with online hemodiafiltration may reduce the risk of mortality/morbidity compared to optimal high-flux hemodialysis. By contrast, intradialytic tolerance is not well studied. The aim of the FRENCHIE (French Convective versus Hemodialysis in Elderly) study was to compare high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration in terms of intradialytic tolerance. In this prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial, 381 elderly chronic hemodialysis patients (over age 65) were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to either high-flux hemodialysis or online hemodiafiltration. The primary outcome was intradialytic tolerance (day 30-day 120). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, cardiovascular risk biomarkers, morbidity, and mortality. During the observational period for intradialytic tolerance, 85% and 84% of patients in high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration arms, respectively, experienced at least one adverse event without significant difference between groups. As exploratory analysis, intradialytic tolerance was also studied, considering the sessions as a statistical unit according to treatment actually received. Over a total of 11,981 sessions, 2,935 were complicated by the occurrence of at least one adverse event, with a significantly lower occurrence in online hemodiafiltration with fewer episodes of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension and muscle cramps. By contrast, health-related quality of life, morbidity, and mortality were not different in both groups. An improvement in the control of metabolic bone disease biomarkers and β2-microglobulin level without change in serum albumin concentration was observed with online hemodiafiltration. Thus, overall outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration over high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 disease in the French national population of dialysis patients, their course of illness and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. Our study included all patients on dialysis recorded in the French REIN Registry in April 2020. Clinical characteristics at last follow-up and the evolution of COVID-19 illness severity over time were recorded for diagnosed cases (either suspicious clinical symptoms, characteristic signs on the chest scan or a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1,621 infected patients were reported on the REIN registry from March 16th, 2020 to May 4th, 2020. Of these, 344 died. The prevalence of COVID-19 patients varied from less than 1% to 10% between regions. The probability of being a case was higher in males, patients with diabetes, those in need of assistance for transfer or treated at a self-care unit. Dialysis at home was associated with a lower probability of being infected as was being a smoker, a former smoker, having an active malignancy, or peripheral vascular disease. Mortality in diagnosed cases (21%) was associated with the same causes as in the general population. Higher age, hypoalbuminemia and the presence of an ischemic heart disease were statistically independently associated with a higher risk of death. Being treated at a selfcare unit was associated with a lower risk. Thus, our study showed a relatively low frequency of COVID-19 among dialysis patients contrary to what might have been assumed.

Dialysis patients exhibit an inverse, L- or U-shaped association between blood pressure and mortality risk, in contrast to the linear association in the general population. We prospectively studied 9333 hemodialysis patients in France, aiming to analyze associations between predialysis systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and nonfatal cardiovascular endpoints for a median follow-up of 548 days. Blood pressure components were tested against outcomes in time-varying covariate linear and fractional polynomial Cox models. Changes throughout follow-up were analyzed with a joint model including both the time-varying covariate of sequential blood pressure and its slope over time. A U-shaped association of systolic blood pressure was found with all-cause mortality and of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure with cardiovascular mortality. There was an L-shaped association of diastolic blood pressure with all-cause mortality. The lowest hazard ratio of all-cause mortality was observed for a systolic blood pressure of 165 mm Hg, and of cardiovascular mortality for systolic/diastolic pressures of 157/90 mm Hg, substantially higher than currently recommended values for the general population. The 95% lower confidence interval was approximately 135/70 mm Hg. We found no significant correlation for either systolic, diastolic, or pulse pressure with myocardial infarction or nontraumatic amputations, but there were significant positive associations between systolic and pulse pressure with stroke (per 10-mm Hg increase: hazard ratios 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.07 and 1.23; and 1.20, 1.11 and 1.31, respectively). Thus, whereas high pre-dialysis blood pressure is associated with stroke risk, low pre-dialysis blood pressure may be both harmful and a proxy for comorbid conditions leading to premature death.

Records of 102 patients with biopsy-proven HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) admitted to 18 hospitals in the Paris area from 1984 through 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics and clinical and laboratory features of the cohort were determined, and prognostic factors of renal and patient survival were analyzed. Renal and patient survival curves were estimated with the actuarial method. Prognostic factors were assessed by uni- and multidimensional analyses based on Cox regression models. Values were expressed as median with interquartile. The total population (median age 34) included 97% blacks and 71.5% males. Median patient follow-up was 165 d (range, 43 to 493). At the time of renal biopsy, median values of serum creatinine, proteinuria, and CD4+ cell count were 496 micromol/L, 6.5 g/24 h, and 48.5 cells/mm3, respectively. Fifteen patients were given steroids after the onset of HIVAN. Overall patient survival at 0.5, 1, and 3 yr was 73 +/- 5, 55 +/- 6, and 38 +/- 7%, respectively. The proportion of patients free of dialysis at 0.5, 1, and 3 yr was 73 +/- 5, 60 +/- 7, and 18 +/- 10%, respectively. Predictors of poor patient prognosis were a low CD4+ cell count (relative risk [RR; per 50 cells/mm3 decrease] 1.35; confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.6) and antiretroviral therapy before the onset of HIVAN (RR 1.9; CI, 1.05 to 3.6). Main independent factors associated with better renal outcome were: steroid therapy (RR 0.29; CI, 0.1 to 0.9); low proteinuria level (RR [per 50% decrease] 0.7; CI, 0.5 to 0.98); low serum creatinine (RR [per 1.1 mg/dl decrease] 0.78; CI, 0.7 to 0.87); and hemoglobin level (RR [per g/dl increase] 0.76; CI, 0.58 to 1.00). HIVAN is not a rare nephropathy in Paris and its suburbs. Renal prognosis and patient survival are better than what was reported previously. Steroids may delay the downward course of HIVAN. It is not certain that in the new era of HIV therapy, the possible renal benefits of corticosteroids outweigh their potential risks. The only reliable predictor of patient survival is the intensity of immunodeficiency.