Objectives Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is a rare inflammatory bone disease. The distinct CNO subtype that affects the anterior chest wall is descriptively named sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis (SCCH) and mainly occurs in adults. Literature on CNO/SCCH is scattered, and lacks diagnostic and therapeutic consensus. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to characterize 1) clinical presentation and i2) therapeutic modalities applied in adult CNO/SCCH patients. Untransformed numerical data and double-arcsine transformed proportional data were pooled in a random effects model in R-4.0.5; proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals(95%CI). Results 40 studies were included, containing data on 2030 and 642 patients for aim 1 and 2 respectively. A female predisposition (67%, 95%CI60-73) and major diagnostic delay (5 years 95%CI3-7) were noted. Clinical presentation included chest pain (89%, 95%CI79-96), and swelling (79%, 95%CI62-91). Patients suffered from pustulosis palmoplantaris (53%, 95%CI37-68), arthritis (24%, 95%CI 11–39) and acne (8%, 95%CI4-13). Inflammatory markers were inconsistently elevated. Autoantibody and HLA-B27 prevalence was normal, and histopathology unspecific. Increased isotope uptake (99%, 95%CI96-100) was a consistent imaging finding. Amongst manifold treatments, pamidronate and biologicals yielded good response in 83%, 95%CI60-98 and 56%, 95%CI26-85 respectively. Conclusion CNO/SCCH literature proves heterogeneous regarding diagnostics and treatment. Timely diagnosis is challenging and mainly follows from increased isotope uptake on nuclear examination. Biopsies, autoantibodies and HLA-status are non-contributory, and biochemical inflammation only variably detected. Based on reported data, bisphosphonates and biologicals seem reasonably effective, but due to limitations in design and heterogeneity between studies the precise magnitude of their effect is uncertain. Fundamentally, international consensus seems imperative to advance clinical care for CNO/SCCH.
BackgroundSternocostoclavicular hyperostosis (SCCH) is a rare disease, constituting a chronic sterile osteomyelitis with elevated bone turnover in the axial skeleton, causing pain and shoulder dysfunction. SCCH severely interferes with daily activities, work, and quality of life. SCCH has a relapse-remitting disease course, but inflammatory-induced sclerotic transformation in the affected area is slowly progressive. Here we present two patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of SCCH treated with intravenous pamidronate, leading to clinical remission in both, but complete resolution of sclerosis in one of them, which is a novel finding in our experience.Case PresentationTwo adult female SCCH-patients presented with longstanding pain, swelling of the anterior chest wall, and compromised shoulder function. Subsequent single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT/CT) illustrated elevated bone activity and sclerosis in the SC region, with hyperostosis, confirming the diagnosis of SCCH. As symptoms in both patients were eventually refractory to standard painkillers such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intravenous pamidronate treatment in 3-month cycles was started. Pamidronate was effective in reducing pain and improving shoulder function and also led to decreased bone turnover on skeletal scintigraphy. Sclerosis in the first patient persisted. In the second patient, however, a complete resolution of sclerosis was observed.ConclusionsSCCH remains a rare bone disorder for which no evidence-based therapies are yet available. While disease burden is high, SCCH lacks recognition and is often diagnosed long after symptomatic presentation. As for the cases in this report, pamidronate was successful in reducing symptoms, and in the second case even led to regression of sclerotic changes on CT-imaging.
BackgroundSternocostoclavicular hyperostosis (SCCH) is an inflammatory bone disorder within the spectrum of chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis. SCCH can be a manifestation of SAPHO syndrome, standing acronym for synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis, but also appears as an isolated clinical entity without joint and skin involvement1,2. Consensus on nomenclature, diagnostic classification, and therapy for SCCH is currently lacking3. Literature is diffuse, and spreads over a wide range of medical disciplines, calling for a first systematic overview.ObjectivesWe critically appraised literature with the aim to i) gain overview on the clinical presentation of SCCH and features leading to diagnosis and to ii) evaluate different treatment modalities and treatment response. We focused on the clinical entity of SCCH in adults, either isolated or as a part of SAPHO syndrome.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines on the clinical presentation and therapeutic modalities applied in adult SCCH patients. Studies covering these respective domains were selected. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools according to study type. Untransformed numerical data and double-arcsine transformed proportional data were analyzed in a random effects model in R-4.0.5; pooled proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Treatment response was categorized as good, partial, or none.Results28(i) and 12(ii) studies were included, containing heterogeneous data on 1818 patients. A female predisposition (67%, 95%CI 60-73) and major diagnostic delay (5 years 95%CI 3-7) were noted. Clinical presentation was marked by anterior chest pain (89%, 95%CI 79-96), and swelling (79%, 95%CI 62-91). Pustulosis palmoplantaris was present in 53%, 95%CI37-68, whereas acne (8%, 95%CI4-13) and peripheral arthritis (24%, 95%CI 11-39) were less prevalent. Inflammatory markers were inconsistently elevated and autoantibodies and HLA-B27 prevalence normal. Histopathology was unspecific, and cultures almost exclusively negative. Increased isotope uptake (99%, 95%CI96-100) was the most consistent imaging finding. Amongst manifold treatments (see Figure 1), NSAIDs were mainly partially effective. Pamidronate and biologicals (mainly TNF-α inhibitors) yielded good, though heterogeneous, response in 83%, 95%CI 60-98 and 56%, 95%CI 26-85 respectively.Figure 1.Treatment modalities applied in SCCH and their effects on bone pain (data from trials and several cohort studies combined)ConclusionLiterature on SCCH is extremely heterogeneous. Timely diagnosis proves challenging and mainly follows from the increased isotope uptake on nuclear examination. Biopsies, autoantibodies and HLA-status are non-contributory, and inflammatory biochemical profiles only variably detected. Pamidronate and TNF-α inhibitors emerged as promising therapies, but powered, placebo-controlled research with standardized measures of response is warranted. Inherently, international consensus on SCCH’s diagnostic classification and name appears critical to improve scientific collaboration on this rare disease, and to advance the development of clinical guidelines.References[1]Saghafi M, Henderson MJ and Buchanan WW. Sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis. YSARH 1993; 22: 215-223. 10.1016/0049-0172(93)80070-v. DOI: papers3://publication/doi/10.1016/0049-0172(93)80070-v.[2]Carroll MB. Sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis: a review. Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease 2011; 3: 101-110. 10.1177/1759720X11398333. DOI: papers3://publication/doi/10.1177/1759720X11398333[3] Kalke S, Perera SD, Patel ND, et al. The sternoclavicular syndrome: experience from a district general hospital and results of a national postal survey. Rheumatology 2001; 40: 170-177. 10.1093/rheumatology/40.2.170. DOI: papers3://publication/doi/10.1093/rheumatology/40.2.170AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Drs. J.W. Schoones, information specialist at the Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, for his contribution to the search strategy and selection of studies.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.