Acute environmental stress rarely implies long lasting neurophysiological and behavioral alterations. On the contrary, chronic stress exerts a potent toxic effect at the glutamatergic synapse whose altered physiology has been recognized as a core trait of neuropsychiatric disorders. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) plays an important role in the homeostatic response to acute stress. In particular, stress induces synthesis of endocannabinoid (eCB) 2arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG). 2-AG stimulates presynaptic cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor contributing to stress response termination through inhibition of glutamate release, restraining thereafter anxiety arousal. We employ mouse models of stress response coupled to gene expression analyses, unravelling that in response to acute psychosocial stress in the mouse hippocampus, ECS-mediated synaptic modulation is enhanced via transcriptional repression of two enzymes involved in 2-AG degradation: α/β-Hydrolase Domain containing 6 (ABHD6) and Monoacylglycerol Lipase (MAGL). Such a process is orchestrated by the epigenetic corepressor LSD1 who directly interacts with promoter regulatory regions of Abhd6 and Magl. Remarkably, negative transcriptional control of Abhd6 and Magl is lost in the hippocampus upon chronic psychosocial stress, possibly contributing to trauma-induced drift of synapse physiology toward uncontrolled glutamate transmission. We previously showed that in mice Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) increases its hippocampal expression in response to psychosocial stress preventing excessive consolidation of anxiety-related plasticity. With this work we unravel a nodal epigenetic modulation of eCB turn over, shedding new light on the molecular substrate of converging stress-terminating effects displayed by ECS and LSD1.

No abstract

No abstract

Emotional and cognitive information processing represent higher-order brain functions. They require coordinated interaction of specialized brain areas via a complex spatial and temporal equilibrium among neuronal cell-autonomous, circuitry, and network mechanisms. The delicate balance can be corrupted by stressful experiences, increasing the risk of developing psychopathologies in vulnerable individuals. Neuropsychiatric disorders affect twenty percent of the western world population, but therapies are still not effective for some patients. Elusive knowledge of molecular pathomechanisms and scarcity of objective biomarkers in humans present complex challenges, while the adoption of rodent models helps to improve our understanding of disease correlate and aids the search for novel pharmacological targets. Stress administration represents a strategy to induce, trace, and modify molecular and behavioral endophenotypes of mood disorders in animals. However, a mouse or rat model will only display one or a few endophenotypes of a specific human psychopathology, which cannot be in any case recapitulated as a whole. To override this issue, shared criteria have been adopted to deconstruct neuropsychiatric disorders, i.e., depression, into specific behavioral aspects, and inherent neurobiological substrates, also recognizable in lower mammals. In this work, we provide a rationale for rodent models of stress administration. In particular, comparing each rodent model with a real-life human traumatic experience, we intend to suggest an introductive guide to better comprehend and interpret these paradigms.

Ten to twenty percent of western countries population suffers from Major Depression Disorder (MDD). Stressful life events represent the main environmental risk factor contributing to the onset of MDD and other stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. In this regard, investigating brain physiology of stress response underlying the remarkable individual variability in terms of behavioral outcome, may uncover stress-vulnerability pathways as a source of candidate targets for conceptually new antidepressant treatments. Serum Response Factor (SRF) has been addressed as a stress transducer via promoting inherent experience-induced Immediate Early Genes (IEGs) expression in neurons. However, in resting conditions, SRF also represents a transcriptional repressor able to assemble the core LSD1/CoREST/HDAC2 corepressor complex, including demethylase and deacetylase activities. We here show that dominant negative SRF splicing isoform lacking most part of the transactivation domain, namely SRFΔ5, owes its transcriptional repressive behavior to the ability of assembling LSD1/CoREST/HDAC2 corepressor complex meanwhile loosing its affinity for transcription-permissive cofactor ELK1. SRFΔ5 is highly expressed in the brain and developmentally regulated. In the light of its activity as negative modulator of dendritic spine density, SRFΔ5 increase along with brain maturation suggests a role in synaptic pruning. Upon acute psychosocial stress SRFΔ5 isoform transiently increases its levels. Remarkably, when stress is chronically repeated a different picture occurs where SRF protein becomes stably upregulated in vulnerable mice but not in resilient animals. These data suggest a role for SRFΔ5 that is restricted to acute stress response, while positive modulation of SRF during chronic stress matches the criteria for stress vulnerability hallmark.