Long-chain acyl-CoAs (LCACoA) are an activated lipid species that are key metabolites in lipid metabolism; they also have a role in the regulation of other cellular processes. However, few studies have linked LCACoA content in rat and human muscle to changes in nutritional status and insulin action. Fasting rats for 18 h significantly elevated the three major LCACoA species in muscle (P < 0.001), whereas high-fat feeding of rats with a safflower oil (18:2) diet produced insulin resistance and increased total LCACoA content (P < 0.0001) by specifically increasing 18:2-CoA. The LCACoA content of red muscle from rats (4-8 nmol/g) was 4- to 10-fold higher than adipose tissue (0.4-0.9 nmol/g, P < 0.001), suggesting that any contamination of muscle samples with adipocytes would contribute little to the LCACoA content of muscle. In humans, the LCACoA content of muscle correlated significantly with a measure of whole body insulin action in 17 male subjects (r(2) = 0.34, P = 0.01), supporting a link between muscle lipid metabolism and insulin action. These results demonstrate that the LCACoA pool reflects lipid metabolism and nutritional state in muscle. We conclude that the LCACoA content of muscle provides a direct index of intracellular lipid metabolism and its links to insulin action, which, unlike triglyceride content, is not subject to contamination by closely associated adipose tissue.

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation is associated with higher mortality. Identification of causes of death and contemporary risk factors for all‐cause mortality may guide interventions.Methods and ResultsIn the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to rivaroxaban or dose‐adjusted warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression with backward elimination identified factors at randomization that were independently associated with all‐cause mortality in the 14 171 participants in the intention‐to‐treat population. The median age was 73 years, and the mean CHADS 2 score was 3.5. Over 1.9 years of median follow‐up, 1214 (8.6%) patients died. Kaplan–Meier mortality rates were 4.2% at 1 year and 8.9% at 2 years. The majority of classified deaths (1081) were cardiovascular (72%), whereas only 6% were nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. No significant difference in all‐cause mortality was observed between the rivaroxaban and warfarin arms (P=0.15). Heart failure (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33–1.70, P<0.0001) and age ≥75 years (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.51–1.90, P<0.0001) were associated with higher all‐cause mortality. Multiple additional characteristics were independently associated with higher mortality, with decreasing creatinine clearance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, male sex, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes being among the most strongly associated (model C‐index 0.677).ConclusionsIn a large population of patients anticoagulated for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, ≈7 in 10 deaths were cardiovascular, whereas <1 in 10 deaths were caused by nonhemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. Optimal prevention and treatment of heart failure, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes may improve survival.Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of valsartan in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction with other angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in essential hypertension.Methods:Systematic literature search of databases between October 1997 and May 2008. Meta-analysis of short-term, double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for treatment of adult hypertension (DBP: 90–115 mmHg). Random-effects meta-regression adjusting for baseline blood pressure (BP) was used to analyse the data. Mean change in SBP and DBP was estimated for each individual drug and dose combination.Results:In all, 31 RCTs (n = 13,110 patients) were included in the analysis. Six studies include trial arms with candesartan, six irbesartan, 13 losartan, two olmesartan, five telmisartan and 12 valsartan. The weighted average reduction in mean SBP and DBP for valsartan 160 mg was −15.32 mmHg (95% CI: −17.09, −13.63) and −11.3 mmHg (95% CI: −12.15, −10.52) and for 320 mg was −15.85 mmHg (95% CI: −17.60, −14.12) and −11.97 mmHg (95% CI: −12.81, −11.16); these are statistically significantly greater reductions compared with losartan 100 mg, which was −12.01 mmHg (95% CI: −13.78, −10.25) and −9.37 mmHg (95% CI: −10.18, −8.54) for SBP and DBP respectively. There is evidence that valsartan 160 mg reduces SBP and DBP more than irbesartan 150 mg and reduced DBP more than candesartan 16 mg. No other statistically significant difference in efficacy is demonstrated.Conclusion:Valsartan administered at 160 or 320 mg is more effective at lowering BP than losartan 100 mg and shows comparable efficacy to other ARBs in patients with essential hypertension.

Summary Aim:  To determine the effects of imperfect adherence (i.e. occasionally missing prescribed doses), and the influence of rate of loss of antihypertensive effect during treatment interruption, on the predicted clinical effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs in reducing mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Method:  The effects of imperfect adherence to antihypertensive treatment regimens were estimated using published patterns of missed doses, and taking into account the rate of loss of antihypertensive effect when doses are missed (loss of BP reduction in mmHg/day; the off‐rate), which varies between drugs. Outcome measures were the predicted mean SBP reduction and CVD risk, determined from the Framingham Risk Equation for CVD. Results:  In patients taking 75% of prescribed doses (typical of clinical practice), only long‐acting drugs with an off‐rate of ∼1 mmHg/day were predicted to maintain almost the full mean SBP‐lowering effect throughout the modelled period. In such patients, using shorter‐acting drugs (e.g. an off‐rate of ∼5–6 mmHg/day) was predicted to lead to a clinically relevant loss of mean SBP reduction of > 2 mmHg. This change also influenced the predicted CVD risk reduction; in patients with a baseline 10‐year CVD risk of 27.0% and who were taking 75% of prescribed doses, a difference in off‐rate from 1 to 5 mmHg/day led to a predicted 0.5% absolute increase in 10‐year CVD risk. Conclusions:  In patients who occasionally miss doses of antihypertensives, modest differences in the rate of loss of antihypertensive effect following treatment interruption may have a clinically relevant impact on SBP reduction and CVD risk. While clinicians must make every effort to counsel and encourage each of their patients to adhere to their prescribed medication, it may also be prudent to prescribe drugs with a low off‐rate to mitigate the potential consequences of missing doses.