The aims of this study were to describe and compare the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of cephalexin (10 mg/kg) after its intravenous (i.v.) administration to five goats in three different physiological status: nonpregnant nonlactating (NPNL), pregnant (P) and nonpregnant lactating (L). Blood samples were collected at predetermined times, and plasma concentrations of cephalexin were measured by microbiological assay. Relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Statistical comparison was performed applying the nonparametric anova. No significant differences were found for cephalexin pharmacokinetic parameters between the L and the NPNL group. Median V(dss) was significantly lower in pregnant goats (0.09 [0.07-0.10] L/kg) compared with NPNL goats (0.16 [0.14-0.49] L/kg). Median total Cl and V(dz) were significantly lower in pregnant goats (0.25 [0.19-0.29] L/h·kg and 0.11 [0.10-0.13] L/kg, respectively) than in lactating goats (0.40 [0.32-0.57] L/h·kg and 0.20 [0.14-0.23] L/kg, respectively). Median AUC(0-∞) was significantly higher in pregnant goats (37.79 [34.75-52.10] μg·h/mL) than in lactating goats (25.11 [17.44-31.14] μg·h/mL). Our study showed that even though some pharmacokinetic parameters of cephalexin are altered in pregnant and lactating goats, these differences are unlikely to be of clinical importance; therefore, no dose adjustment would be necessary during pregnancy and lactation.
We investigate the pharmacokinetics of two different cephalexin formulations administered to llamas by the intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC) routes, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cephalexin against some Escherichia coli and staphylococci isolated from llamas, and we apply the PK/PD modelling approach, so that effective dosage recommendations for this species could be made. Six llamas received immediate (10 mg/kg, IV, IM, and SC) and sustained (8 mg/kg IM, SC) release cephalexin. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental approach. Immediate release SC administration produced a significantly longer elimination half-life as compared with the IV and IM administration (1.3 ± 0.2 versus 0.6 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.1 h, resp.) and higher mean absorption time as compared with the IM administration (1.7 ± 0.5 versus 0.6 ± 0.4 h). Absolute bioavailability was in the range of 72–89% for both formulations and routes of administration. Cephalexin MIC90 values against staphylococci and E. coli were 1.0 and 8.0 μg/mL, respectively. Our results show that the immediate release formulation (10 mg/kg) would be effective for treating staphylococcal infections administered every 8 h (IM) or 12 h (SC), whereas the sustained release formulation (8 mg/kg) would require the IM or SC administration every 12 or 24 h, respectively.
Ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin, is widely used for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The aims of the present study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and to estimate the T > MIC against P. aeruginosa, after its intramuscular (i.m.) administration at two different dosing times (08:30 h and 20:30 h) to dogs, in order to determine whether time-of-day administration modifies ceftazidime pharmacokinetics and/or predicted clinical antipseudomonal efficacy. Six female healthy beagle dogs were administered ceftazidime pentahydrate by the intramuscular route in a single dose of 25 mg/kg at both 08:30 and 20:30 h, two weeks apart. Plasma ceftazidime concentrations were determined by microbiological assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) and 4xMIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were calculated from the disposition curve of each dog. No differences between the daytime and nighttime administrations were found for the main pharmacokinetic parameters, including C(max), t(max), t((1/2) lambda), AUC, and MRT; however, the high interindividual variability shown by these values and the small number of individuals may account for this lack of difference. Rate of absorption (k(a)) was significantly higher after the 20:30 h than 08:30 h administration. No significant differences between T > MIC were found when comparing the 08:30 h and 20:30 h administrations. Mean T > MIC values predicted a favorable bacteriostatic effect for all susceptible strains of P. aeruginosa for the 12 h dosing interval at both dosing times. Our results suggest that similar antipseudomonal activity may be expected when ceftazidime is administered at 8:30 and 20:30 h; however, as only two timepoints of drug administration were explored, we are unable to draw any conclusions for other treatment times during the 24 h.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.