The tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is a major threat to tomato production in Rwanda. Laboratory bioassays were conducted to evaluate some commercial entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) formulations on T. absoluta larvae. The larvae, inside the leaf galleries, were obtained from the established tomato field. Commercial EPF: Metatech® WP [Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorok, Strain FCM Ar 23B3], Beauvitech® WP [Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill., Strain J25], and Botanigard ES [B. bassiana (Bals.), Strain GHA] were tested in Petri dishes against T. absoluta larvae at a concentration of 10 8 spores/ml. A synthetic insecticide, imidacloprid was included for comparison as a positive control, while water was used as a negative control. All the tested commercial EPF formulations were pathogenic to T. absoluta larvae in all conducted bioassays. Mortality rates increased with an increase in time (days). However, the insignificant difference was observed in the mortality of T. absoluta larvae treated with the commercial EPF during the first 3 days in all bioassays. Highly significant differences (p < 0.01) in pathogenicity among treatments were observed from the 4th to 6th days after inoculation. Metatech® WP and Beauvitech® WP recorded the highest mortality rates (82.8 and 60.8%) with the LT 50 values of 3.9 and 5.2 days, respectively, while imidacloprid caused the least larval mortality. Since the EPF demonstrated high virulence level against the target pest, the efficacy of Metatech® WP and Beauvitech® WP should be advanced to field evaluation to determine their potential as alternatives to the synthetic insecticides.
Tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), is a major threat to tomato production as it can cause up to 100% yield loss under both greenhouse and open-field conditions. Chemical control, which is associated with several undesirable effects, remains the only option readily available for this pest since its invasion of Rwanda in the year 2015. This study assessed the potential of using local isolates of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) in management of T. absoluta in Rwanda. Six EPNs including four locally isolated strains: Steinernema sp. RW14-M-C2a-3, Steinernema sp. RW14-M-C2b-1, S. carpocapsae RW14-G-R3a-2 and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora RW14-N-C4a, and two exotic species: S. carpocapsae All and H. bacteriophora H06 were evaluated. Three bioassays were conducted in the laboratory, using a tomato leaflet with third instar T. absoluta larva in gallery and 9-cm Petri dishes as bioassay arenas in a completely randomized design with three replications. The EPNs were applied at a volume of 1 ml containing 500 infective juveniles per leaflet, while sterile tap water was used as negative control. Larval mortality was checked continuously for 96 h at 24 h interval. The results revealed that all the tested EPNs were able to find and kill T. absoluta larvae inside the leaf galleries; and their efficacy increased with exposure time. The pathogenicity effects were significantly different (p < 0.05) among EPNs. In the first 24 h after inoculation, the efficacy of local EPN isolates (53.3-96.7%) was significantly higher than the one of exotic species (0.0-26.7%). The efficacy of three Rwandan EPN isolates, Steinernema sp. RW14-M-C2a-3, Steinernema sp. RW14-M-C2b-1, and S. carpocapsae RW14-G-R3a-2 was not significantly different from 24 to 96 h after inoculation, except for S. carpocapsae RW14-G-R3a-2 during 24 h after inoculation in bioassay 3. There was insignificant difference among all the EPN isolates after 96 h of exposure. This is the first study carried out in Rwanda that investigated the potential of locally isolated EPNs against T. absoluta. Field experiments should be conducted to fully explore the possibilities of using local EPN isolates in integrated pest management of T. absoluta in Rwanda.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.