Fluticasone and beclomethasone aqueous nasal sprays are effective in treating the symptoms of severe nasal polyps. There was some evidence that the group treated with FPANS responded more quickly to intervention and that the magnitude of the response was greater than in the group receiving beclomethasone.
We compared the efficacy of twice-daily doses of remogliflozin etabonate (RE) and once-daily pioglitazone with placebo for reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration. In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized, active- and placebo-controlled trial, 336 treatment-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of 7.0-9.5% (53-80 mmol/mol) were randomized to RE (50, 100, 250, 500 or 1000 mg twice daily), matching placebo or 30 mg pioglitazone once daily. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline. Other endpoints included changes in body weight, lipid levels, safety and tolerability. RE produced a decreasing dose response in HbA1c at week 12 (p < 0.001), with reductions in HbA1c versus placebo ranging from 0.64 to 1.07% (p < 0.001). Statistically significant reductions in body weight for RE compared with placebo were also observed. Twice-daily RE resulted in a dose-ordered improvement in glycaemic control and was generally well tolerated.
The sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor remogliflozin etabonate (RE) was evaluated in a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study. A total of 252 newly diagnosed and drug-naïve people with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations of 7.0-≤9.5% (53-80 mmol/mol) were recruited. Participants were randomized to RE (100, 250, 500 or 1000 mg once daily or 250 mg twice daily), placebo or 30 mg pioglitazone once daily. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c concentration from baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in fasting plasma glucose, body weight and lipid profiles, safety and tolerability. We observed a statistically significant trend in the RE dose-response relationship for change from baseline in HbA1c at week 12 (p < 0.047). RE was generally well tolerated and no effects on LDL cholesterol were observed.
This multi-national, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 500 microg twice daily propelled either by the non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant, hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a, or the CFC propellants 11 and 12 used in the established pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). The study period was 12 months and involved 412 subjects with moderate to severe asthma (HFA 134a pMDI: n = 203; CFC pMDI: n = 209). For the first 3 months, subjects kept a daily record card and attended the clinic every 4 weeks. Thereafter, they kept daily diaries for 2 weeks before each clinic assessment, which were performed at the end of 6, 9 and 12 months. Mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased during the first week in both treatment groups. By the end of week 12 the adjusted mean increase from baseline in morning PEF was 21 and 23 l min(-1) in the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI groups, respectively, and this increase was maintained throughout the 12-month study period. Similar improvements were detected in other diary card parameters and in clinic lung function measurements. The two groups were shown to be clinically equivalent in terms of all efficacy variables and there were no differences in tolerability. There were few reports of low serum cortisol levels during the 12-month study period, and serum cortisol levels were similar at baseline and after 12 weeks and 12 months of treatment in the two groups. In conclusion, the new HFA 134a fluticasone propionate pMDI is as effective and safe as the established CFC fluticasone propionate pMDI when used at a dosage of 1 mg day(-1).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.