No abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized study to clarify the role of radiotherapy of the primary tumor in limited small-cell cancer of the lung. After stratification for sex and for performance score based on the ability to ambulate, patients were randomly assigned to receive initial radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, delayed radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. The chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, etoposide (VP-16-213), and vincristine, with doxorubicin subsequently replacing etoposide in alternate cycles 7 through 18. Chemotherapy was given every three weeks for 18 months. The radiotherapy comprised 4000 rad in four weeks, followed by a 1000-rad "boost" directed against residual disease. All patients received prophylactic whole-brain radiation. The patients enrolled totaled 426, and 399 were evaluable. There was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of complete responses in favor of the two radiotherapy regimens (P = 0.0013). Failure-free survival was also longer with these two regimens (P less than 0.001), as was the interval before treatment failure in the chest (P less than 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.0099). As expected, toxic effects--chiefly neutropenia--were also increased. The addition of radiotherapy of the primary tumor to combination chemotherapy improved both complete-response rates and survival, with increased but acceptable toxicity.

Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) accrued 1,745 patients with limited (LD) or extensive (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCCL) to five separate trials between 1972 and 1986. We reviewed these data to evaluate the impact of pretreatment prognostic factors on outcome. In multivariate analysis, female gender was predictive of improved response (LD, P = .01; ED, P = .04) and survival (LD, P = .01; ED, P = .02). A performance status of 0 or 1 was associated with improved response rates in both subsets, but was statistically significant (P = .04) only for overall objective response in LD patients. Performance status was a highly significant predictor of survival in both LD and ED groups (P less than .001). Supraclavicular lymph node involvement, while still LD, had a borderline unfavorable impact on survival (P = .06) compared with a lesser extent of LD involvement. In ED patients, a decrease in survival rates was associated with an increased number of metastatic sites (P = .01). Changes in the patient population were noted with time: the percentage of women increased from 21% to greater than 35%; an increased number of metastatic sites was identified among ED patients; mean performance status improved for both LD and ED subsets. These trends reflect the changing demographics of lung cancer, improved lung cancer staging, and probably lead-time bias. Response rates, overall survival, and long-term (greater than 2-year) survival varied significantly among the five protocols, both before and after multivariate correction for identified prognostic variables. However, the changing character of the study population limits the ability to determine retrospectively how much improvements in therapy contributed to the positive changes in failure-free survival, overall survival, and long-term survival observed in our sequentially studied population.

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the role of warfarin and alternating chemotherapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCCL). After stratification for sex and performance status, patients were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), cyclophosphamide, and lomustine (CCNU) (MACC), or MACC plus warfarin (MACC + W), or mitomycin, etoposide, cisplatin, and hexamethylmelamine alternating with MACC (MEPH/MACC). Warfarin was given continuously to maintain a prothrombin time of one and one half to twice the control values. A total of 328 patients were enrolled, and 294 were evaluable. There was a statistically significant advantage in objective response rates (complete [CR] and partial responses [PR], respectively) for MACC + W (17% and 50%) as compared with MACC alone (8% and 43%) or MEPH/MACC (10% and 38%) (P = .012). Both failure-free survival (P = .054 Wilcoxon test) and overall survival (P = .098 Wilcoxon test) were higher on MACC + W (median, 6.6 months and 9.3 months, respectively), as compared with MACC (5.0 months and 7.9 months) and MEPH/MACC (5.0 months and 7.9 months). Toxicity was comparable among the three arms, except for increased hemorrhagic events on MACC + W, which were life-threatening in four patients (4%), and lethal in two others (2%). These data support the role of warfarin in the treatment of SCCL, but do not establish its mechanism of action. Warfarin deserves further studies in SCCL, particularly in patients with limited disease.

SummaryThe relationship between interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels and clinical parameters was studied in 25 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. The serum levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein, a,-acid glycoprotein and fibrinogen were significantly higher in mesothelioma than in lung adenocarcinoma with cytology-positive pleural effusion. Serum IL-6 levels correlated with the levels of the acute-phase proteins. We demonstrated a high incidence of thrombocytosis (48%) and a significant correlation between platelet count and the serum IL-6 level. The level of IL-6 in the pleural fluid of patients with mesothelioma was significantly higher than in the pleural fluid of patients with adenocarcinoma, and was about 60-1400 times higher than in the serum. However, even higher levels of IL-6 in the pleural fluid and of thrombocytosis were found in patients with tuberculous pleurisy. These results indicate that large amounts of IL-6 from the pleural fluid of patients with mesothelioma leak into the systemic circulation and induce clinical inflammatory reactions. These profiles are not specific to mesothelioma as similar profiles are found in patients with tuberculous pleurisy. However, the detection of a markedly increased level of IL-6 in pleural fluid argues against a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma.