This paper re‐examines the dividend policy issue by conducting a simultaneous test of the alternative explanations of corporate payout policy using a two‐step procedure that involves factor analysis and multiple regression. Several new proxies for theoretical attributes that have appeared in the literature are introduced, including the role of managerial dimensions in determining dividend policy. Strong support is found for the transaction cost/residual theory of dividends. pecking order argument, and the role of dividends in mitigating agency problems. Strong support is also found for the role of managerial consideration in affecting the firm's payout policy; specifically, firms that maintain stable dividend policies and firms that enjoy financial flexibility pay higher dividends. The results appear to support the tax clientele argument.

A voluntary divestiture may either be a sell‐off or a spin‐off. In a sell‐off, the divesting firm receives cash (or cash equivalents) and gives up ownership and control of the divested asset. In a spin‐off, the divested asset becomes an independent entity under a new management but ownership remains with the old stockholders of the original firm. The study investigates the divestiture decision and the choice between sell‐offs and spin‐offs by constructing a model of the multi‐divisional firm. The results show that firms undertake voluntary divestitures because of low marginal return coupled with high joint operating and financial costs. The form of the divestiture is determined by the operating risk of the division being divested. The implications of the model are empirically tested for the period 1969–87 and the results support the postulates of the model.

A convertible bond (CB) is a hybrid security containing elements of both common stock and straight debt. Still, empirical investigations on CB issue announcements have failed to discern any pattern in the stock market reaction that is consistent with announcements of either common equity or straight debt issues. This study shows that (a) motives for issuing the CB and (b) its rating (and to a less extent the riskiness of the issuing firm) help explain the stock market reaction to CB issue announcements. Specifically, announcement of a CB issue with an explicitly stated motive for the use of proceeds, when coupled with a high (low) bond rating, generates a stock market response similar to a straight debt (common stock) issue. On the other hand, the preference of CB holders is dictated by the motive for the use of proceeds and the conversion premium. These findings highlight the critical importance of the motive of issue in determining reactions in both the stock and bond markets.

The present study shades light on the short-term wealth effects of the share repurchase decision of Indian IPO firms on their stock prices. For the years 2000–2019, the sample considers the IPO companies who announce buybacks within 5 years after their listing. By evaluating short-term fluctuations in stock prices around the buyback announcement date, wealth effects have been quantified using the event study approach. According to our empirical investigation, investors responded favourably to the news and produced positive 1.13% nonsignificant abnormal returns on the event day. Further investigation finds that these companies likewise endure erratic stock performance in the days that follow the announcement, with the exception of the day when they actually purchase back their shares, which produced positive and significant abnormal returns to investors of 0.92%. Also, over the event window, the results are positive at 10.69% and significant. Our results show that investors favourably view share repurchase by IPO firms and can regard it as a sound investment strategy. This study also adds to the scanty literature about newly listed firms’ payout preferences.