Introduction. The study of the manifestations of symptoms of COVID-19 and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) is an important aspect of the diagnosis, especially for regions endemic for HFRS.Aim. To conduct сomparative study of the clinical symptoms and parametres of a complete blood test at the onset of the disease with lung involvement in patients with HFRS and COVID-19 with moderate severity.Materials and methods. A retrospective comparative analysis and identification of laboratory data of patients with moderate form of HFRS with respiratory syndrome (n = 52) and patients with moderate severity form of COVID-19 (n = 52) upon admission to the hospital was carried out.Results. Fever is one of the main symptoms for both diseases, characterizing the degree of severity. At the same time, the temperature in patients with HFRS on admission was higher than in patients with COVID-19 (p < 0.05). Shortness of breath is much more often recorded in the group of patients with viral pneumonia COVID-19 (p = 0.0001). The oxygen saturation index (SpO2) in patients with HFRS was below 95%, but the average value of 96.4% was normal, while in patients with COVID-19 the average value was 92.8% (p < 0.05). When comparing the indicators of the general blood test, there was a statistically significant excess of the level of red blood cells and hematocrit in the group of patients with COVID-19, with a comparable level of hemoglobin in both groups. The average value of the absolute content of platelets was significantly lower, and the number of patients with thrombocytopenia is much higher in the group of patients with HFRS.Conclusion. Kidney damage in HFRS is the main clinical and laboratory syndrome, but it is important to remember that lung damage by the type of viral pneumonia in HFRS is also possible. In all suspicious cases, an examination for SARS-CoV-2 and serological diagnosis of hantavirus infection are indicated.
В данной работе проведен сравнительный анализ результатов анкетирования студентов медицинского и технического вузов по оценке обучения с использованием дистанционных образовательных технологий в период пандемии новой коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19. Всего в исследовании приняли участие 82 обучающихся очной формы: 50 студентов 4-го курса ФГБОУ ВО БГМУ Минздрава России и 32 обучающихся в магистратуре 1 год ФГБОУ ВО УГНТУ. Использовали обзор тематической литературы, аналитический и статистический (χ2 хи-квадрат Пирсона) методы исследования. Студенты медицинского вуза отметили возрастание нагрузки, преимущественно за счет письменных работ. Студенты обоих вузов среди положительных моментов выделили возможность записи лекций и их повторного просмотра, среди негативных моментов указали на дефицит «живого» общения. Основные трудности в период дистанционного обучения имели технический характер. По мнению абсолютного большинства студентов, для лекций предпочтителен формат онлайн. Имеются статистически значимые различия по вопросам формата проведения практических занятий. Активно внедряя информационные технологии в образовательный процесс, важно учитывать специфику практико-ориентированных специальностей (медицинских) и социальные потребности студентов в «живом» общении. Ключевые слова: пандемия, дистанционное обучение, студенты, медицинский вуз, технический вуз.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.