The present study evaluated how 2 widely used cephalometric sagittal analyses, ANB angle and WITS appraisal, classify skeletal classes I, II, and III in a random selection of 497 Finnish boys aged 4-20 years. This distribution was also compared with the visual inspection of cephalometric structures judged by 2 university instructors in orthodontics. The results showed remarkable differences and even sparked controversy concerning classification of the sagittal jaw relationships. The ANB angle and the WITS appraisal emphasized the role of class II based on a failure to distinguish the proportion of class I. The low-angle influence skewed the distribution of the ANB pattern in the class III direction, and the WITS pattern, conversely, towards class II. High- or low-angle influence had only minor effects on the visual inspection of cephalometric structures. This cross-sectional study showed an age-related decreasing mean value for the ANB angle and increasing mean value for the WITS appraisal, thus explaining the remarkable difference in the distribution of sagittal classes. However, the findings of age-related changes makes the use of the fixed norms questionable. For extreme or controversial cephalometric interpretations, visual inspection provides an essential aid in diagnosis and skeletal classification.
Abstract— The cytotoxicity of seven solutions used in root canal therapy was tested in human fibroblast and lymphoblast cultures. The amount of cell damage was assessed by measuring the release of 51Cr form labeled cells into the medium. The solutions, When applied at therapeutic concentrations, displayed high toxicity in vitro and difference in cytotoxicity were seen between different solutions. Generally, lymphoblasts were found to be more sensitive than fibroblasts. The cytotoxic profiles of the two cell types resembled each other except when 5% sodium bypochlorite or 0.2% Hibitance was used. When the criterion of total cell lysis was 50%51Cr release, The toxic concentrations of the solutions tested ranged between 1:25 and 1:900 (v/v) for fibroblasts. For lymphoblasts the corresponding concentration range was between 1:40 and 1:750. Despite technical simplicity and good reproducibility the 51Cr release method proved unreliable for testing the cytotoxicity of endodontic solutions. Because the methodological errors cannot be foreseen the 51Cr release method requires supproting evidence form other methods.
The aim of the present study was to define some cephalometric standards in a group of 217 Finnish girls from 7.0 to 18.0 years of age and furthermore to estimate the influence of the skeletal classes on these standards. Age-related changes were seen between the standards of the youngest (7.0-9.5 years) and the oldest (14.5-18.0 years) group where 9 out of 15 of the inspected angles increased with age, three of them ANPr***, SNPg** and SNB* significantly, and 6 decreased, four of them significantly: ANPg***, ANB**, NL/ML* and RL/ML*. The cranial base angles did not show any significant age-related or skeletal type-related variations. Between the skeletal groups I and II significant differences were seen in 11 variables. Between skeletal I and III groups, 7 angles were significantly different. The results demonstrate that when cephalometric standards are used, they should be derived from that population, they should be age related, and the skeletal pattern should be taken into account.
– Molar teeth from 9‐day‐old rats were cultured for 7 days in medium supplemented with 1 or 10 ppm Cd for 1 or 3 h or 7 days. After culture the Cd concentrations were measured separately from the mineralizing parts and the cell‐containing tissues. The accumulation of Cd increased with the duration of treatment and the concentration used, being more intensive in the hard parts than the soft tissues of the teeth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.