Lack of resolution of hyperparathyroidism after long-term renal transplantation is common. The relative roles of the graft function attained and the degree of pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism have not been established. Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and several clinical parameters were studied before and 68.6+/-26.8 months (range: 30-124) after renal transplantation in 62 patients (20 females/42 males) with good renal function (creatinine <2 mg/dl). iPTH decreased from 214+/-229 pre-transplantation to 116+/-70 pg/ml post-transplantation (P<0.01). However, only 22.6% of patients had PTH concentrations in the normal range, and values greater than twice the upper normal limit were not uncommon (27.4%). Of the many variables analysed, creatinine (r=0.43; P=0.001) and pre-transplant PTH (r=0.31; P=0.02) significantly correlated with post-transplant PTH. After selecting patients with serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dl (n=46), pre-transplant PTH emerged as the more important predictor of post-transplant PTH (r=0.58; P<0.0001). After controlling for creatinine, the partial correlation was r=0.53, P<0.0001. We concluded that spontaneous resolution of hyperparathyroidism after renal transplantation is uncommon. In addition, the magnitude of pre-transplant hyperparathyroidism and the renal function determine the long-term post-transplant parathyroid function.

No abstract

Summary In nonheart‐beating donor (NHBD) kidney transplants, immunosuppressive management is difficult mainly because of the high incidence of acute tubular necrosis. This has meant that since the start of our NHBD transplant program, several immunosuppression regimes have been used. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results obtained over 7 years using different treatment protocols. A total of 172 consecutive NHBD transplants performed between April 1996 and December 2002 were treated as follows: G‐I (n = 21), cyclosporine (8 mg/kg/day) plus azathioprine plus steroids; G‐II (n = 65), low‐dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; G‐III (n =17), low‐dose tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; and G‐IV (n = 69), daclizumab plus low‐dose tacrolimus plus mycophenolate plus steroids. Delayed graft function rates were 76.2%, 72.3%, 76.5%, and 42%, respectively, for the four groups (P = 0.000). Rejection‐free patient rates were 76.2%, 46.2%, 35.3%, and 71% (P < 0.001). Vascular rejection rates were 19%, 30.8%, 52.9%, and 18.8%, (P = 0.025). Two‐year graft survival was 71.4% in group I, 95.4% in group II, 94.1 in group III, and 93.8% in group IV (P =0.004). Patient survival was worse in group I (75.2% in group I, 100% in group II, 100% in group III, and 96.7% in group IV at 2 years; P < 0.001). The use of daclizumab and low‐dose tacrolimus could be effective at lowering the incidence of delayed graft function in NHBDT, with no negative repercussions on acute rejection.

No abstract

No abstract