The effect of medium viscosity upon cell growth and aggregate characteristics of baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells cultivated in stirred tanks was evaluated. Two thickening agents were tested, 9300 MW dextran and a low-viscosity sodium (carboxymethyl)-cellulose; both were used in two different sets of experiments: (i) 250 cm3 Wheaton spinner flasks with a ball impeller operated at 45 rpm; (ii) 500 cm3 Corning spinner flasks with a paddle impeller, operated at constant power dissipation (88 cm2 s-3). Aggregate diameter and the fraction of cells in aggregates increased with the increase in viscosity. Power laws were applied to the experimental results. A dependence of aggregate size upon power dissipation of the order of -0.19 and kinematic viscosity of 0.34 and 0.49 for the constant agitation and constant power dissipation tests were obtained, respectively. A model based upon the entire universal-equilibrium range (i.e., the entire spectrum of isotropic eddies) was used to predict theoretical relationships between the variables studied. The model leads to a power dependence of -0.25 for the energy dissipated in the entire universal-equilibrium range and between 0.25 and 0.5 for the kinematic viscosity in the viscous dissipation subrange, depending on the energy correlation used; it also gives a good explanation for the dependence of aggregate size on the hydrodynamics of the vessel.

No abstract

Large‐scale animal cell operation is costly both in terms of facilities and consumables. Hence developmental studies with animal cells normally start at laboratory scale, often using small stirred tanks. In order to better optimise cell performance, it is necessary to know the physical conditions under which the cells are grown. In this study a laboratory‐scale vessel (2 dm3 working volume) with two large‐bladed paddle impellers was characterised hydrodynamically. Three different aeration methods (surface, sparging and membrane aeration) were investigated and compared. Power input and oxygen transfer rates to culture medium were determined as a function of agitation and gas flow rates. Non‐dimensional correlations were established for each case, which can be useful for scale‐up purposes. The results obtained indicate that power input is quite dependent on the vessel accessories: for the same agitation rate, the maximum power is required for the membrane structure and the minimum for surface aeration, with the addition of the sparger leading to an intermediate situation. Predictions found in the literature can be used for simple vessels, but may not be applicable when accessories are added to the vessel structure; in such cases, the use of experimental relationships are required. Oxygen transfer rate was dependent on the aeration method and working conditions (agitation and gas flow rates), particularly for sparger aeration. Membrane aeration gave larger oxygen transfer but higher gas pressure and flow rates were required. Surface aeration was the least effective method, nevertheless requiring gas flow rates similar to those used for membrane aeration. The aeration method of choice depends upon the culture and work specificities: surface aeration is limited to small cell concentrations and low oxygen consumption rates. For higher cell concentrations and oxygen consumption rates, both membrane and sparger aeration methods can be applied: the use of the sparger is limited to cells that are not affected by the presence of bubbles or the addition of surfactants, whereas the membrane aeration basket should not be used when a hydrodynamically controlled stirred tank is required.

No abstract

No abstract