epidural en la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica / Epidural analgesia in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2017.Este es un archivo PDF de un manuscrito inédito que ha sido aceptado para su publicación en la Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor. Como un servicio a nuestros clientes estamos proporcionando esta primera versión del manuscrito en estado de prepublicación. El manuscrito será sometido a la corrección de estilo final, composición y revisión de la prueba resultante antes de que se publique en su forma final. Tenga en cuenta que durante el proceso de producción se pueden dar errores lo que podría afectar el contenido final. El copyright y todos los derechos legales que se aplican al artículo pertenecen a la Revista de la Sociedad Española de Dolor. ABSTRACT Introduction:Epidural analgesia is an effective technique for postoperative pain relief.Our aim in this retrospective study was to assess the postoperative pain control and complications relating to epidural technique in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Material and methods:A retrospective analysis of 193 patients who underwent LRP, in which epidural analgesia was the postoperative pain approach, was performed. The procedure is generally performed under combined anesthesia. Data collected was postoperative pain data; appearance of neurological disorders (Bromage scale was used for motor weakness assessment); data related to the epidural technique and possible difficulties when performing it; data on epidural infusion; catheter-related complications; hospital stay, postoperative complications, and outcome.Results: Firstly, average VAS at rest was 1.2 ± 1.6; and upon movement, average VAS was 1.9 ± 1.8 during the hospital stay. Secondly, complications related to epidural technique appeared in 37 % of patients. There were 3 cases of hematic puncture; 3 accidental catheter disconnections; 1 dural puncture, and 1 subdural block. As for neurological secondary effects of local anesthetics in the epidural technique, 56 patients (30.1 %) presented with motor block of one or both lower extremities after surgery, and 5 (2.7 %) with paresthesia. Statistical analysis showed that motor weakness was not related to age, weight, type of local anesthetic used, infusion rate, level of epidural puncture nor length of catheter within the epidural space (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Postoperative epidural analgesia offers excellent analgesic quality but it can be associated with several complications secondary to the use of local anesthetics, which could disagree with the terms of Fast-track surgery. New techniques like the TAP block could offer the same analgesic quality, without the epidural´s technique potential complications. Keywords: Laparoscopic prostatectomy, epidural analgesia, postoperative pain, neurologic complications. RESUMEN Objetivos: La analgesia epidural es una técnica eficaz para el control del dolor postoperatorio. Nuestro objetivo en este estudio retrospectivo fue evaluar el control del dolor postoperatorio mediante la ...