Saleh and Bonnet [Fechner Day 98, p. 344] have shown that, upon parafoveal stimulation and up to 6.5 c/deg, reaction time (RT) is a function of grating contrast multiplied by grating period. The present experiments extend these findings to foveal stimulation within a wider spatial-frequency (SF) range and to stimuli of different duration. Both RT and latency of visually evoked potentials (VEP) were measured. The findings might be explained by the following assumption: Most RT and VEP latency variations across the SF range are a result of local intensity factors (retinal contrast and width of grating bars). Residual RT variations were found that might be due to processing of high SFs by slower mechanisms than those processing low and medium SFs.

No abstract

Visually evoked potentials (VEP) and reaction time (RT) were recorded under stimulation with sinusoidal gratings. Grating spatial frequency (SF) was 0.5, 5 or 12 cd and grating contrast was varied. Consistent with previous findings, both VEP latency and RT increased with the increase of grating SF and with the decrease of grating contrast. It was found, in addition, that RT and VEP latency increased by approximately the same amount when SF increased from 0.5 to 5 cd, thus suggesting that the main source of the RT delay at 5 cd in comparison with RT at 0.5 cd is of peripheral origin. However, in comparison with the data at 0.5 and 5 cd, RT at 12 cd increased much more than VEP latency. We conclude that the RT delay at high SF involves a substantial central component in addition to the peripheral delay.

We studied spatial summation for S-cone ON and OFF signals as a function of retinal eccentricity in human subjects. S-cone isolation was obtained by the two-colour threshold method of Stiles, modified by adding blue light to the yellow background. Test stimuli were blue light increments or decrements within a circular area of variable size. These were presented for 100 ms at 0 to 20 deg along the horizontal temporal retinal meridian. Ricco's area of complete spatial summation was measured from the threshold vs. area curves. This was nearly constant and approximately the same for both types of stimuli within the 0-5 deg range and increased beyond this range. The decremental area increased faster, suggesting that separate mechanisms, presumably ON and OFF, integrate S-cone increments and decrements. The results appear to provide new evidence for the existence of separate S-cone ON and OFF pathways. We compare the data with known morphology of primate retina and assume that, if S-cone decrements are detected via separate OFF cells, these should differ in density and dendritic field size from the S-cone ON cells, but only in the retinal periphery.

Weber contrast, DeltaL/L, is a widely used contrast metric for aperiodic stimuli. Zele, Cao & Pokorny [Zele, A. J., Cao, D., & Pokorny, J. (2007). Threshold units: A correct metric for reaction time? Vision Research, 47, 608-611] found that neither Weber contrast nor its transform to detection-threshold units equates human reaction times in response to luminance increments and decrements under selective rod stimulation. Here we show that their rod reaction times are equated when plotted against the spatial luminance ratio between the stimulus and its background (L(max)/L(min), the larger and smaller of background and stimulus luminances). Similarly, reaction times to parafoveal S-cone selective increments and decrements from our previous studies [Murzac, A. (2004). A comparative study of the temporal characteristics of processing of S-cone incremental and decremental signals. PhD thesis, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Murzac, A., & Vassilev, A. (2004). Reaction time to S-cone increments and decrements. In: 7th European conference on visual perception, Budapest, August 22-26. Perception, 33, 180 (Abstract).], are better described by the spatial luminance ratio than by Weber contrast. We assume that the type of stimulus detection by temporal (successive) luminance discrimination, by spatial (simultaneous) luminance discrimination or by both [Sperling, G., & Sondhi, M. M. (1968). Model for visual luminance discrimination and flicker detection. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 58, 1133-1145.] determines the appropriateness of one or other contrast metric for reaction time.