This study investigates the fines content influence on liquefaction potential of a single base sand mixed with three different essentially nonplastic silts through strain-controlled monotonic undrained triaxial compression tests. Confining stress (30 kPa) and deposition method (dry funnel deposition) were kept the same, while fines content was varied, to solely focus on how different silts and their contents influence the undrained response of the sand under comparable conditions. It was found that if the mean grain diameter ratio (D50-sand/d50-silt) of the sand grains to silt grains is sufficiently small, the liquefaction potential of the sand increases steadily with increasing fines content for the studied range (0%–20%). As D50-sand/d50-silt increases, the liquefaction potential of the silty sand might actually be less than the liquefaction potential of the clean sand. Test results also revealed that commonly used comparison bases (i.e., void ratio, intergranular void ratio, relative density) are not sufficient for assessing the influence of fines on liquefaction potential of silty sands. Finally, relative size of the silt grains should also be considered in geotechnical engineering practice in addition to content and plasticity of fines to characterize the influence of silt on liquefaction potential of sands.

Triaxial tests have been performed to demonstrate the conditions for stability and instability in loose silty sand. Drucker (1951) and Hill (1958) stability conditions in terms of the sign of the second work increment were employed in the design of the stress paths used in the triaxial compression and extension tests performed with quasi-constant shear stress while the mean normal stress was reduced until failure occurred. It is shown that the sand is completely stable under drained conditions for any stress path and irrespective of the sign of the second work increment. This is demonstrated by completely stopping the change in stresses and observing the stable behavior in the range of stresses where the sand contracts and where it dilates. Once the effective stress failure surface is passed, the sand becomes unstable, and the sign of the second work increment is always negative. Run-away instability can occur inside the failure surface for loose silty sand under undrained conditions for which the sand tends to contract, pore pressures continue to develop, and the second work increment is negative. Liquefaction may follow if the loose silty sand is sufficiently loose.