Aims
Diseases of maricultured species caused by Vibrio harveyi are increasing in China and other regions. This study examined the genetic diversity, antimicrobial susceptibility, plasmid profiles and virulence potential of the V. harveyi isolated from marine organisms farmed in two provinces in eastern China between 2014 and 2019.
Methods and Results
A total of 54 V. harveyi were obtained from seven marine species. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)‐PCR fingerprinting revealed substantial genetic heterogeneity among the V. harveyi isolates. There was no significant correlation between ERIC‐PCR genotypes and host origins or fish farms. All the isolates were resistant to amoxicillin and ampicillin, and 79·6% to kanamycin. We found that 61·1% of the V. harveyi isolates had plasmid(s) and there were 14 different plasmid profiles. Most isolates from fish hosts (76·5%) contained plasmids; however, 75% of isolates from nonfish hosts lacked plasmids. Experimental infection results showed that isolates with plasmid(s) were more virulent to large yellow croaker than isolates lacking plasmids (P < 0·05).
Conclusions
This study confirmed that V. harveyi isolates obtained from animals farmed in the coastal region of east China were genetically diverse. Our results suggest that the virulence of various V. harveyi strains to fish is associated with the plasmids they carry.
Significance and Impact of the Study
More than 50% of the V. harveyi isolates carried one to 11 plasmids. The plasmid‐borne traits of V. harveyi strains might be important for host adaptation and virulence, but they were not associated with susceptibility to the tested antibiotics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.