Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a congenital developmental malformation and is one of the leading causes of drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE). Although focal epilepsies traditionally have been regarded as acquired disorders, increasing evidence suggests a substantial genetic contribution to the pathogenesis of focal structural epilepsies, including FCDs. Mutations in the Dishevelled, Egl-10 and domain-containing protein 5 (DEPDC5) have recently emerged as a causative gene mutation in familial focal epilepsies associated with FCD type 2a, including Bottom of sulcus dysplasia (BOSD). We present a case of a 20-year-old man with DRFE, positive for DEPDC5 c.1555C>T (p.GIn519*) heterozygous pathogenic variant. Initial 3T brain MRI was unrevealing, but subsequent 7T MRI including 7T edge-enhancing gradient echo (EDGE), revealed a left superior frontal sulcus BOSD concordant with the electroclinical data. The patient underwent treatment with MR-guided laser interstitial thermal ablation of the left frontal BOSD without intracranial EEG monitoring ("skipped candidate”), resulting in a seizure-free outcome of nine months since the last follow-up. Our case highlights the real-world application of summative information obtained through advancements in epilepsy–genetic testing, minimally invasive surgeries, and ultra-high field MRI, allowing us to provide a safe and effective treatment for a patient with a genetic DRFE.

Summary: The responsive neurostimulator continuously monitors the electrocorticogram. It delivers short bursts of high-frequency electrical stimulation when personalized patterns are detected. Intracranial EEG recording including electrocorticography is susceptible to artifacts, albeit at a lesser frequency compared with scalp recording. The authors describe a novel case of a patient with focal epilepsy, bitemporal responsive neurostimulation, and seizures without self-awareness manifest as focal impaired awareness seizures adversely affecting memory. At follow-up evaluation, the patient reported being clinically seizure-free although a single long episode was detected using the Patient Data Management System over the course of 3 years. Initial review identified a left-sided rhythmic discharge with a bilateral spatial field of involvement. In response to detection, the responsive neurostimulation delivered a series of five electrical stimulations. On further review, the patient recalled undergoing cervical radiofrequency ablation, which coincided with the appearance of the “electrographic seizure.” Extrinsic electrical artifact involving monomorphic nonevolving waveforms confirmed electrical artifact identified and treated by responsive neurostimulation as an epileptic seizure. On rare occasion, implanted electrical devices may lead to misdiagnosis and mistreatment of patients because of intracranial artifact.

Neuromodulation in epilepsy is a proven treatment for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Dual device therapies are increasingly utilized in people with drugresistant epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) target the thalamus involving the primary neurobiological network in patients with genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE). We report a novel case of combined neuromodulation in a patient with drug-resistant GGE who achieved a partial response with seizure reduction after VNS implantation yet following VNS-DBS polyneurostimulation gradually achieved prolonged seizure freedom.We speculate that by combining the indirect activating effects of VNS with the direct inhibitory effects of DBS, this may provide synergy to thalamic modulated networks. We hypothesize a "rational polytherapy" may exist in some patients with GGE undergoing dual neuromodulation.