No abstract

Diabetes Mellitus type II (DM II) is a worldwide disease with a rapidly growing parallel prevalence and adversities affecting multi-body systems. Hence, it is imperative to treat DM II effectively, maintaining glucose homeostasis to avoid complications such as diabetic nephropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and retinopathy. Vitamin D, among many benefits, has positive outcomes on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control. It aids in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We systematically screened four databases for relevant information; PubMed, Medline, PMC, and Google scholar. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and quality appraisal was then done using certain checklist tools: Newcastle-Ottawa tool, AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist, SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) checklist, and Cochrane bias assessment. Data were collected from 14 articles, of which eight are systematic reviews and meta-analysis, one is a narrative review, five are randomized controlled trials and three are general information about DM II and Vitamin D. In addition, this article evaluates the clinical significance of Vitamin D administration in DM II from a glucose homeostasis perspective, and complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Vitamin D had a clinical positive impact on glucose level, particularly on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction, alleviation of diabetic neuropathy and nephropathy symptoms, and hyperglycemia induced-oxidative stress on the retinal cells.

Caffeinated drinks are the most widely consumed beverages globally and their intake has increased in the elderly. Caffeine exhibits dose-dependent adverse effects. Low to moderate doses cause anxiety, restlessness, irritability, and nausea. High doses of 3-5g can affect different physiological systems and lead to detrimental effects like palpitations, hypertension, agitation, seizures, and coma. Low-dose aspirin is the most used anticoagulant in preventing ischemic vascular events. An increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage is associated with low-dose aspirin with an intensified intracerebral hemorrhage risk. The aim of this research is to explore the association between caffeine and aspirin in causing lethal intracranial hemorrhage in the older population. Because of the devastating nature of intracranial hemorrhages and the inconsistent published data on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in individuals taking both aspirin and caffeine, we conducted a systematic review considering the elderly population.We conducted the study following the reporting guidelines for systematic review and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined. Data was collected from PubMed, PubMed Central® (PMC), National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), and Web of Science by applying keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms individually. Our initial search yielded 155,270 articles, which were scrutinized, and duplicates were removed for accuracy. Of these, a total of 13 research papers were finally extracted using the PRISMA recommendations and applying other inclusion and exclusion criteria. With the help of our systematic review, we could determine that both aspirin and caffeine portrayed a role in causing intracranial hemorrhage independently, but further studies are recommended to evaluate if both could lead to similar adverse effects when taken collectively.

No abstract

No abstract