Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a pharmacist-provided spirometry service within a federally qualified health center on the percentage of spirometry referrals completed with results reviewed by the ordering provider. Secondary objectives evaluated differences between internal and external referrals, medication recommendations made by the pharmacist, and revenue brought in by the service. Methods: Chart reviews were completed to determine the referral completion rates between patients who received a spirometry referral before (December 2014–September 2015) and after (January 2016–October 2016) the implementation of the pharmacy-provided spirometry service. Chart reviews were also used to determine the number and completion rate among referrals for internal and external services in the postimplementation time frame. Chart reviews also assessed medication recommendations made by the pharmacist. Results: The results demonstrate an increase in referral completion rate from 38.1% to 47.0% (P = .08) between the pre- and postimplementation time frames. In the postimplementation time frame, there was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of referrals completed between in-house referrals and external referrals (70.0% and 40.9%, respectively, P = .0004). Comparing clinics with and without the spirometry service, there was a statistically significant difference in the total number of spirometry referrals (1.13% and 0.59%, respectively, P < .0001) and the percent of referrals completed (0.55% and 0.27%, respectively, P = .0002). Conclusion: The results suggest that offering spirometry within the primary care setting helps to increase the rate of completed spirometry tests with results available to the primary care provider. Additionally, the results show that there is an increased completion rate in patients who receive an internal spirometry referral, which may be due to reduced barriers in obtaining this testing. Overall, these results demonstrate that providing spirometry in the primary care setting helps to increase spirometry results obtained and could be beneficial in other primary care settings.

Clinic-based food referral programs (FRPs) may help alleviate food insecurity and improve access to nutritious foods by systematically identifying and referring food-insecure primary care patients to community-based food resources. The purpose of this study was to examine the barriers to and facilitators of implementation of an FRP offered to primary care patients who screen positive for food insecurity and have a qualifying chronic condition. we used a multi-stakeholder approach to conduct semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and administrators from an academic medical center (AMC) (n = 20), representatives of a regional foodbank and its affiliated pantries (n = 11), and patients referred to the FRP (n = 20), during the initial phase of FRP implementation from April to September 2020. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using a deductive dominant approach that allowed for the identification of emergent themes. Seven major themes emerged across the two domains of analysis: barriers to and facilitators of FRP implementation. Key barriers were (a) provider time constraints and competing demands; (b) inadequate physician feedback regarding patient use of the program; (c) patient transportation barriers; and (d) stigma associated with food pantry use. Key facilitators of implementation included (a) program champions; (b) screening and referral coordination; and (c) addressing food pantry-related stigma. This study identifies factors that deter and facilitate the implementation of an AMC-based FRP. Our findings highlight opportunities for healthcare and community-based organizations to refine and optimize FRP models toward the ultimate aim of advancing health equity for food-insecure patients.

Research Objective Evidence suggests that clinic‐based food referral programs (FRP) offer health benefits to food insecure patients, yet little attention has been paid to understanding patient utilization of such programs. Our study addresses this gap by reporting on the patient characteristics associated with uptake and utilization of a FRP—the Mid‐Ohio Farmacy (MOF). The MOF is a partnership between a Midwestern regional foodbank and local healthcare providers, including a large, academic medical center (AMC). The MOF uses a variation on food vouchers: an electronic referral from a patient's primary care provider to one of 14 partner food pantries in the metropolitan area. Referred patients who visit a participating pantry are eligible to receive fresh produce once weekly. Study Design This observational study leverages data from two AMC family medicine clinics offering the MOF referral from September 2019 to November 2020. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between filling a MOF referral (i.e., pantry visitor vs. non‐visitor) and patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients and their pantry visits were characterized based on their pre‐referral utilization (i.e., new or existing patrons; pre‐ or post‐referral pantry visit) to assess patterns of pantry utilization. Population Studied AMC patients 18 years or older who screened positive for food insecurity and had an eligible chronic condition. Eligible conditions included a diagnosis of diabetes with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) >9%, obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), or hypertension; uncontrolled diabetes defined as a HbA1C > 9% with or without a diabetes diagnosis; or uncontrolled hypertension defined as blood pressure > 140/90 with a hypertension diagnosis. Principal Findings In total, 51% (164/322) of patients who received a MOF referral visited a pantry at least once during the study period. Three factors were associated with an increased likelihood of filling a MOF referral: a 1‐year increase in age (0.7%; p < 0.01); diabetes diagnosis (11%; p < 0.05); and pantry visits prior to referral (36%; p < 0.001). Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were 19% (p < 0.001) less likely to visit a pantry following their referral. Relative to new visitors, existing visitors had a greater total number of visits following referral, shorter days to their first visit following referral, and travelled shorter distances. Existing visitors had more total pantry visits and more produce‐specific visits in the 90‐days following their referral relative to the 90‐days prior to their referral. Conclusions Our results suggest that while the MOF can connect patients to food resources, further attention may be needed to encourage its use among patients who have not previously accessed pantries. Implications for Policy or Practice Changes to the MOF program may be necessary such as adding one additional question to the food insecurity screening process (e.g., “Have you used a food pantry in the last year?”), so that potential first‐time users could be...

No abstract

No abstract