Given the current political climate in the United States, it is ever more important to understand the role political ideology plays in the counseling profession. Our study examined the role of political ideologies in 467 licensed mental health counselors' preferred counseling theories in clinical practice. We found (a) most participants reported liberal political ideologies; (b) the participants preferred cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), humanistic/constructivist/existentialist, and mindfulness-based theories over systemic, psychodynamic, and experiential theories; and (c) self-identification as conservative, registration with the Republican Party, and endorsement of Libertarian beliefs predicted a preference for CBT, self-identified liberal ideology predicted a preference for psychodynamic theory, and lower levels of libertarian beliefs predicted a preference for humanistic theories. Implications for research, practice, and education are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
A large body of research has pointed to the potential impact of clinical mental health counselors’ (CMHCs) personal, social, and religious beliefs on their treatment objectives, but no research has examined the role of CMHCs’ political beliefs on their treatment objectives, especially with politicized issues such as firearms in homes with young children. In the present study, we examined the treatment objectives for clients with firearms at home in relation to American CMHCs’ political beliefs (operationalized as political ideologies and political party affiliations), perceived level of seriousness of firearm storage in a home with small children, and general assessment of biopsychosocial status of new clients. Survey data were collected with Qualtrics from 147 licensed CMHCs who were members of the American Mental Health Counselors Association (AMHCA). Perceived seriousness of firearms at home and treatment objectives related to firearms at home (e.g., discouraging firearm storage at home) were assessed using a vignette depicting a 38-year-old male client with two small children at home. General assessment of biopsychosocial status of new clients was measured with the frequency that the CMHC would inquire about 10 topics (e.g., substance use) during the initial appointment with new clients. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that perceived seriousness of firearms at home and general assessment of biopsychosocial assessment were the most robust and expected predictors of the American CMHCs’ treatment objectives. However, the CMHCs’ political ideologies and political party affiliations were not significant, suggesting that CMHCs’ clinical interactions with the client were guided by professional training/experiences, not by political beliefs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.