Industrial areas play a critical role in urban and regional planning, especially for developing countries where reliable strategies for these areas can promote economic and environmental efficiency. The present study provides an integration of hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) theories and Geographical Information System (GIS) processes in order to assess the suitability of an industrial location. Unlike traditional models, an efficient decision analysis demands handling uncertainties and considering dependencies between criteria. The proposed MCDM framework uses fuzzy theory because of the vagueness of experts' judgements. Moreover, Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) is employed to investigate interrelationships among the criteria. In the proposed empirical solution, analytic network process (ANP) principles are used to deal with systematic interactions. We considered several factors such as accessibility, topography, proximity, and socioeconomic characteristics in the decision-making procedure for a sustainable industrial park. The system is applied to Hamadan province, Iran to determine appropriate locations that are the results of the aggregation of criteria maps in a GIS environment. The results demonstrate that accessibility and economic indicators are essential for choosing an industrial park's location. Additionally, the proposed method can be applied for an efficiency evaluation of available industrial parks.KEY WORDS industrial park establishment; fuzzy theory; analytic network process; land suitability analysis; urban and regional planning

No abstract

No abstract

Mass concentration (mascon) solutions for GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) data are widely used in various regional-to-global mass change studies. The current advances in the mascon solution have mainly concentrated on improving the spatial resolution of the solution, enhancing the applied least-squares regularization, and the characterization of the solution errors. Most of the mascon solutions are obtained on the equal-area grid, inducing complexities in creating the grid and its presentation. In this regard, estimation of the mascon solutions on equiangular grids can be appealing. Furthermore, in the equal-area methods, there is no global criterion to determine the size of the mascon areas. The mascon size is usually chosen in a subjective manner which hampers the objective application of different mascon solutions. In view of these challenges, two main questions are addressed in this study: i) what kind of modifications should be made in computation scheme of the mascon solution if equiangular grids are used to account for different areas of the grid patches, and ii) in case of non-equiangular solutions, how to define an objective criterion for the patch sizes based on the resolution of both the observation and the signal of interest. We investigate the performance of the high-resolution mascon-based approach, proposed by Abedini et al. [2021], which uses GRACE-like observations similar to level-1 data for a period of one month over the Greenland region. Two main practical issues are studied on the estimation of the surface density changes as follows. First, we show that for equiangular grids, the area of the patches should be accounted for in the regularization by introducing area-affected weights for the unknown parameters. We investigate the effect of three different area-affected weighting strategies on the derived solution. Secondly in order to obtain proper size for the patches, a novel approach is presented to investigate the performance of the mascon solution using the analysis of the resolution matrix entries. The proposed resolution analysis is used to obtain the optimal patch size for the discretization of the area of interest. Based on the results, it is demonstrated that the minimum legible patch size in the Greenland area for the current settings of the GRACE observations is 0.5 degree in the NS direction and a latitude-adaptive grid-size rather than equiangular grids at high latitude regions in the EW direction.

ABSTRACT:Being one of the most controversial issues in urban planning, land use planning has always been in the focus of researches. Land use planning is a subdivision of urban planning which tends to arrange land uses in order to avoid conflicts among them. In order to achieve a transparent and effective urban planning, land uses should be located and allocated in an ideal situation so that avoid negative impacts from neighbouring parcels and land uses. Neighbouring land uses can produce externalities and negative impacts on other land uses because of inter-land use interaction. These externalities may be undesirable effects such as noise, air and visual pollution or may be caused by hazardous facilities. The main objective of this research is to propose a new multi-criteria evaluation model for land use compatibility assessment. Considering the fact that a considerable number of factors affect the compatibility degree of neighbouring land uses, a multi-criteria evaluation approach is employed to address the aforementioned problem. This research employs the integration of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) methods to facilitate land use compatibility evaluation with respect to optimism degree. The applicability of the proposed model is illustrated by the problem of land use compatibility assessment for elementary schools in Tehran. The results indicate that most of the current schools are situated in a location which is incompatible for the land use type of elementary school especially in the southern and central parts of the city.