The aim of this study was to create an experimental model of disc degeneration that closely mimicked human disc degeneration. In six domestic pigs, an L4 cranial endplate perforation into the nucleus pulposus was made. Three months postoperatively, compressive testing was performed on the L2-L4 motion segments, and intradiscal pressure was measured in the intervening discs. Histochemical and morphologic examinations were made on the excised degenerated and adjacent discs. A significant reduction in water content was observed in the outer anterior annulus of the degenerated disc. In the nucleus, the proteoglycan content was significantly reduced, as well as the cellularity, although not significantly. The nucleus lost its gel-like structure and was discolored, and there was delamination of annular layers. Intradiscal pressure in the nucleus was significantly lower in the degenerated disc. In conclusion, experimental degeneration of the intervertebral disc induced by endplate penetration resembled human disc degeneration, as exemplified by biochemical and structural changes.
This study was conducted to determine retrospectively the factors which influence fracture healing and risk for nonunion in patients with tibial shaft fractures. One hundred consecutive patients with 104 tibial shaft fractures and a mean age of 40 (14-85) years were reviewed. Fractures were classified according to the AO classification system. There were 22 open fractures and 52 comminuted fractures. Thirty-eight fractures were caused by high-energy trauma. Fracture pattern, soft-tissue condition, level of energy of the trauma, malalignment, and treatment methods were identified. The influence of these factors on the time of hospital stay and sick-leave, delayed union, and nonunion were calculated. Normal healing occurred in 61 fractures with a mean healing time of 17 weeks, delayed union in 27 with a mean of 35 weeks, and nonunion in 16 with a mean of 69 weeks. The relative risk of developing nonunion in open fractures was 8.2 (CI = 2.9-10.5) and 2.9 (CI = 1.2-3.2) in fractures exposed to high-energy trauma. This study showed that the soft-tissue condition and level of trauma energy are good predictors for the development of complications. Considering these risk factors at an early stage in the planning of treatment might reduce the risk of nonunion. ergy level of the trauma, fracture comminution, initial fracture displacement, treatment method, contamination, and associated injuries will influence fracture healing. Conservative treatment has in general been recommended for undisplaced closed or grade I open fractures caused by low-energy trauma [15, 18, 21]. However, conservative treatment of a tibial shaft fracture means immobilization of the lower leg for a long period of time, especially if healing is delayed. Thus, it is important to consider the risk of healing complications when planning the appropriate treatment method in the early stage after the injury. The purpose of this study was to analyze complications such as delayed union and nonunion and to identify factors which affect the healing of tibial shaft fractures.
Background Anterior knee pain and young age of the patient have been considered justification for removal of a tibial intramedullary nail. There have been few reports on the outcome after nail removal, however.Patients and methods We studied 71 patients in whom 72 tibial nails had been removed. We used self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate the location, intensity, and frequency of pain before and after removal. The degree of satisfaction was scored on a visual analog scale.Results 39 of 71 patients had less pain after removal of the nail, but were not asymptomatic. 14 patients had unaltered pain, and 18 patients had increased pain. 4 of 6 patients who had been treated with fasciotomy were not satisfied with the outcome of nail removal.Interpretation The results of nail removal to alleviate pain are poor. Removal of a nail should not be undertaken unless there is a convincing indication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.