Surface roughness is a crucial parameter in the hydraulic fracturing process, affecting rock toughness, fluid flow and proppant transport; however, the scale-dependent nature of hydraulic fracture surfaces is not well studied. In this paper, we examined four fractal methods, compass, box-counting, variation and roughness-length, to evaluate and compare the fractal dimension of the surface roughness profiles created by laboratory hydraulic fracturing. Synthetic surface profiles were generated by the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot function, which was initially used to test the accuracy of the four methods. Each profile had a predefined fractal dimension that was revisited by these methods. Then, the fractal analysis was performed for experimental fracture surfaces, which were created by a hydraulic fracturing experiment in a true triaxial situation. By comparing fractal analysis results, we found that for both synthetic and laboratory fracture height profiles, the roughness-length method provides a relatively more reliable estimation of the fractal dimension. This method predicts the dimension for synthetic surface within an error of less than 1%, considering a wide range of surface heights from centimetres down to micrometres. By increasing the fractal dimension of surface profiles, the error of fractal estimation increased for all four methods. Among them, the variation method provided the closest results to the roughness-length method when considering both experimental and synthetic surfaces. The evaluated fractal dimension may provide a guideline for either field- or laboratory-scale hydraulic fracturing treatments to evaluate the effects of surface roughness on fracture growth.
The fracture surface roughness is an essential characteristic of the hydraulic fracturing process and has not been fully explored. The surface asperities play a significant role in proppant flow and settlement, fluid leak-off and fracture tip movement. In this study, we performed an experimental investigation to evaluate the fracture surface roughness of a hydraulic fracture generated in the lab tests. The experiments were conducted using a polyaxial cell and a cuboid siltstone block with dimensions of 20 cm × 20 cm × 16.5 cm. The fracturing fluid was injected into a drilled hole in the specimen to initiate and propagate the hydraulic fracture in nearly homogeneous siltstone material. Low injection rates were applied to all lab tests to maintain slow and stable fracture propagation as in the field. The fracture surfaces were digitised by surface mapping techniques utilising high-resolution laser scanning method and analysed using a standard statistical way. Our results showed that the surface topography and roughness parameters are different in various selected segments. However, they follow an increasing trend in radial directions from the initiation point at the wellbore wall toward the specimen borders.
Tracking the migration of injected CO2 is critical to understanding the performance of subsurface intervals selected for CO2 sequestration. Measuring and analyzing the shape and magnitude of the surface deformation caused by subsurface CO2 injection, provides confidence that sequestered CO2 will remain in the target formations. Surface deformation information for onshore injection operations can be obtained via InSAR satellite imagery or an array of high-resolution tiltmeters installed in shallow (10-15m deep) boreholes.In this study, synthetic tilt data produced from a full 3D finite element model of the In Salah CO2 injection site, are used to determine the shape and location of the CO2 plume at the three injection wells. A strong tilt signal ( > 0.1 microrad) can be observed well ahead of the equivalent detectable surface heave ( > 2 mm, typical InSAR limitation magnitude). The inverse analysis for an array of ten tiltmeters around each of three injection wells clearly shows whether the injected CO2 remained in the target layer or leaked into a nearby fault. Results show that tracking the tilt vectors on the top of the fault can inform the operators of the onset of the fault pressurization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.