Altered sensory processing has been an important feature of the clinical descriptions of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is evidence that sensory dysregulation arises early in the progression of ASD and impacts social functioning. This paper reviews behavioral and neurobiological evidence that describes how sensory deficits across multiple modalities (vision, hearing, touch, olfaction, gustation, and multisensory integration) could impact social functions in ASD. Theoretical models of ASD and their implications for the relationship between sensory and social functioning are discussed. Furthermore, neural differences in anatomy, function, and connectivity of different regions underlying sensory and social processing are also discussed. We conclude that there are multiple mechanisms through which early sensory dysregulation in ASD could cascade into social deficits across development. Future research is needed to clarify these mechanisms, and specific focus should be given to distinguish between deficits in primary sensory processing and altered top-down attentional and cognitive processes.
Key PointsQuestionDo children with previously normal neurocognitive function who survive an episode of acute respiratory failure requiring intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation have worse long-term neurocognitive function than their matched siblings?FindingsIn this cohort study that included 121 sibling pairs, children discharged from intensive care hospitalization for respiratory failure without severe cognitive dysfunction compared with their matched siblings had a mean IQ score of 101.5 vs 104.3, a difference that was statistically significant.MeaningAcute respiratory failure in early childhood was associated with a slightly, but statistically significant, lower subsequent IQ score.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.