Introduction: Ventral hernia repair is one of the challenging surgical operations over time. Several surgical techniques for mesh repair have been described (onlay, inlay, sublay, and underlay repairs). It is suggested that sublay mesh repair has the lowest recurrence and surgical site infection in open anterior abdominal hernia repair. This study aimed to analyze the pros and cons of the sublay mesh in ventral hernia repair to evaluate the significance of this technique as a treatment modality. Hospital stay, acute postoperative complications, and the recurrence rate were the main areas of investigation.Methods: A retrospective study on 79 patients with ventral hernias who were operated on with sublay mesh repair between January 2015 and December 2018 was conducted. Patients were admitted through the elective route. The study included fit patients with first-time ventral hernias (primary and incisional). Recurrent hernia, patients with decompensated cardiopulmonary disorders, and bleeding disorders were excluded from the project. The project pro forma includes patient's demographics, operative details, length of stay, postoperative complications, and follow-up up to 12 months.Results: All patients underwent open mesh repair using the sublay technique. The ventral hernia was five times more common in females than males. The mean age of presentation was 44.8 years old. The mean operating time was 67 minutes and a one-day hospital stay. Paraumblical and incisional hernias represented the majority of cases. The component separation approach was added in three cases (3.7%). Simultaneous cholecystectomy was performed in two cases (2.5%). Only six cases (6.3%) developed wound-related complications, while two cases (2.5%) had a recurrence. Conclusion:The sublay mesh repair is a perfect choice for the repair of ventral abdominal hernia. It is associated with a smooth and short hospital stay and the least incidence of complications and recurrence.

IntroductionContracture is a pathological scar tissue resulting from local skin tissue damage, secondary to different local factors. It can restrict joint mobility, resulting in deformity and disability. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of skin grafts compared to local flaps to reconstruct post-burn elbow contractures. These parameters included regaining function, range of movement, recurrence, and local wound complications. MethodologyA retrospective study reviewed 21 patients for elbow reconstruction over 12 months. Only patients with post-burn elbow contracture were included. Other causes, including previous corrective surgery, associated elbow stiffness, and patients who opted out of post-operative physiotherapy, were excluded. Patients were categorized according to the method of coverage into three groups: graft alone (G1), local flap (G2), or combined approach (G3). ResultsFemales were three times at higher risk to suffer a burn injury, while almost half of the cases were children. Scald injury represented 81% of burn causes. G1,2,3 were used in 47.6%, 42.9% and 9.5% of cases retrospectively. The overall rate of infection was 28.6%. Hundred percent graft taken was recorded in 83.3 % of cases; however, flap take was 91.1%. After 12 months of follow-up, re-contracture was 60% and 22.8% in G1 and G2; however, the satisfaction rate was 70% and 100% in both groups retrospectively. The overall satisfaction was 85.7% in all groups. ConclusionGrafts and local flaps are reasonable options for post contracture release; however, flaps are superior. Coverage selection depends on the lost tissue area and exposure of underlying deep structures. Physiotherapy and patient satisfaction are crucial in the outcomes.