Background: Infected Achilles tendon is difficult to manage especially in diabetic patients. Total excision of the infected tendon may provide better option for limb salvage in these patients where altered walking pattern can minimize expected subsequent functional impairment.Patients and methods: 35 diabetics with infected Achilles tendon were enrolled in this study. Nineteen patients underwent complete tendon excision (Group A) while in the remaining 16 patients, the tendon was partially excised (Group B). After wound approximation, negative pressure was applied to achieve healing by secondary intention. Initial immobilization and splinting were done followed by gradual weight bearing. Heel-rise test, activity limitation, walking difficulty on different surfaces and gait abnormalities were used to assess functional outcome.Results: Group A had significantly larger ulcer size compared to Group B (9.23 ± 2.04 vs 7.35 ± 3.30 cm2, P = 0.05). Also, mean ulcer duration was significantly longer in Group A (2.53 ± 0.75 vs 1.09 ± 0.49 months, P < 0.001). Group A showed significantly shorter healing time (3.14 ± 0.79 vs 7.05 ± 1.56 months, P < 0.001), shorter follow-up period (5.32 ± 1.6 vs 8.25 ± 2.94 months, P = 0.001) and lower reintervention rate (5.26% vs 56.25%, P < 0.001) compared to Group B. Functional assessment showed more limitation in heel-rise in total excision group, yet without significant limitation in other functional parameters, including walking ability.
Conclusion:Total excision of infected Achilles tendon in diabetic patients can give higher healing success rates with minimal functional impairment compared to partial tendon excision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.