Background and Aim: Ultrasonographic fetal sexing is of utmost economic importance for horse breeders. Relatively, a few studies have been conducted to determine fetal sex in mare using transrectal Doppler ultrasound. This study aimed to compare two sexing techniques, two-dimensional (2D) mode and color Doppler ultrasonography.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 39 mares under field conditions. Examinations were performed using the ultrasonic model device (Medison SonoAce Pico, South Korea), equipped with real-time 3-7 MHz convex multifrequency transducer. Fetal sex diagnosis was carried out in two periods of pregnancy, early period (57-80 days of gestation) and late period (80-150 days of gestation).
Results: No difference (p=0.4) was observed between the efficiency of the 2D mode and Doppler ultrasound in sex determination with the respective frequency of 74% and 85%. The best time to sex the early fetus was between 57 and 70 days of gestation and between 90 and 120 days for the older fetus.
Conclusion: The accuracy of sex determination can be increased using Doppler mode compared to 2D mode, especially in the early period between 57 and 70 days, in male more than female sex.
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Image processing of muscular fibre has significantly improved over the last decades, from light microscopy acquisition to virtual microscopy and from manual segmentation and fibre typing to automatic. The study aims to discuss main tools used in different histoenzymological image processing phases of muscle fibre, which are consecutively, acquisition, segmentation and fibre typing and theirs efficacy in morphometric parameters’ determination. Firstly, the acquisition, optical microscopic image with different magnifications (x100, x200, x250 and x400) were compared with virtual slides digitized by Slide Scanner, in muscle fibre sections, for cell number counting. Secondly, the segmentation, three software (Fiji «Digitizing pen, Mouse», Image Pro Plus 10 -semi-automatic- and Cytoinformatics LLC -automatic-) were compared for image segmentation quality and fibbers number determination. Thirdly, manual fibre typing with Fiji of segmented images using three software cited previously were performed to calculate the accuracy of morphometric parameter (CSA, perimeter and DMF). Results of acquisition showed that scanner slide have a better resolution and detected a higher number of cells compared to optical microscopic with different magnifications. For this latter, the processing can be performed only with an acceptable resolution, where the number of cells is lesser, which requires unfortunately several repetitions and exhausting work. Our findings regarding segmentation indicate that Cytoinformatics LLC showed the best processing time and the highest quality followed by IP and Fiji. For the last step, morphometric parameter calculation showed the best accuracy using Fiji followed by Cytoinformatics and finally by IP. The findings of this study suggest that Fiji (semi-automatic) showed the best quality/price ratio (open access software) for segmentation and fibre typing, but time consuming compared to Image Pro Plus 10 (semi-automatic) and Cytoinformatics LLC (automatic) which are a paid service.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.