The purposes of this study were a) to summarize measurements of airborne (respirable) crystalline silica dust exposure levels among U.S. workers, b) to provide an update of the 1990 Stewart and Rice report on airborne silica exposure levels in high-risk industries and occupations with data for the time period 1988–2003, c) to estimate the number of workers potentially exposed to silica in industries that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) inspected for high exposure levels, and d) to conduct time trend analyses on airborne silica dust exposure levels for time-weighted average (TWA) measurements. Compliance inspection data that were taken from the OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) for 1988–2003 (n = 7,209) were used to measure the airborne crystalline silica dust exposure levels among U.S. workers. A second-order autoregressive model was applied to assess the change in the mean silica exposure measurements over time. The overall geometric mean of silica exposure levels for 8-hr personal TWA samples collected during programmed inspections was 0.077 mg/m3, well above the applicable American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists threshold limit value of 0.05 mg/m3. Surgical appliances supplies industry [Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 3842] had the lowest geometric mean silica exposure level of 0.017 mg/m3, compared with the highest level, 0.166 mg/m3, for the metal valves and pipe fitting industry (SIC 3494), for an 8-hr TWA measurement. Although a downward trend in the airborne silica exposure levels was observed during 1988–2003, the results showed that 3.6% of the sampled workers were exposed above the OSHA-calculated permissible exposure limit.
Few studies have estimated the prevalence and mean urinary cadmium levels in U.S. workers and the factors associated with high cadmium exposure. In this study, urinary cadmium measurements were obtained on 11228 U.S. workers aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-1994). Urinary cadmium levels ranged from 0.01 to 15.57 microg/L, with a geometric mean of 0.30 microg/L (0.28 microg/g creatinine) for all U.S. workers. The prevalence of urinary cadmium levels >or=5 microg/L was 0.42% (551000) for U.S. workers aged 18 to 64 years. Among U.S. workers in the metal industry (two-digit Standard Industrial Classification or SIC codes 33 and 34), the geometric mean urinary cadmium level was 0.48 microg/L (0.39 microg/g creatinine), and 0.45% of these workers had urinary cadmium levels >or=10 microg/L. The prevalence of urinary cadmium levels >or=15 microg/L was 0.0028% (3907). The agriculture industry (two-digit SIC codes 01, 02, and 07-09) was associated with low urinary cadmium levels, compared with repair services industries (two-digit SIC codes 75 and 76). Results from ordinary least squares regression analyses indicated that smokers had significantly higher urinary cadmium levels than nonsmokers (p
The objective of this study was to estimate the annual cost of disability among people with diabetes. Data from the 1994 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 83,566) of US individuals aged 18 to 64 years were used to estimate the annual cost of disability among people with self-reported diabetes. After we adjusted for relevant socioeconomic characteristics, logistic regression analyses demonstrated that people with diabetes are more likely to stop working outside the home (for men: adjusted odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 8.0; for women: adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 8.8). The annual cost of disability among people with diabetes was estimated at $9.3 billion in 1994. Disability among people with diabetes is a major public health problem. Efforts to reduce disability in this population could create substantial gains in productivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.