Aim: management of a clinical case with irreversible pulpitis for young adult molar with closed apices using analogous blood derivative PRF and evaluating the clinical and radiographic success for coronal pulpotomy. Summary: A 18 years old male patient reported to the screening clinic, was referred to endodontic clinic with acute pulpitis diagnosed in left first molar tooth. Deep occlusal caries involving pulp, with history of spontaneous lingering pain associated with sign and symptoms of pulpitis. Standard clinical care protocol was strictly implemented, rubber dam isolation was followed by coronal pulpotomy. Blood drawn from cuboidal vein. Platelet rich fibrin membrane placed over the remaining pulp and restored with MTA and finally with Glass ionomer cement. Follow-up results clinically and radio-graphically were encouraging and successful at day 1 to 24 months. No postoperative pain, the treated tooth responded to pulp sensibility test and radiographs revealed periapical healing. However, for standardization of the clinical procedure well designed research study is further needed.

Objective: The purpose of this review for the magnification aids in endodontics was to describe in detail various magnifying devices, their use and the advantages and disadvantages in clinical surgical and conventional endodontic therapy with recent innovation and technological advancement in magnifying Methodology: The author searched Qassim university library relevant journal articles manually and the website MEDLINE, Clinical key, EBSCO, google Scholar, Cochrane. The keywords for the search articles were dental operating microscope, dental magnifying loupes, dental endoscopes, dental orascope, root canal treatment, endodontic micro-surgeries magnification devices. The relevant articles describing the magnification devices were considered for the review. Conclusion:The literature on the magnification devices is very limited for the most recent magnifying devices and their use is also very limited to the elite and developed countries in endodontic practice. However, dental operating microscope, being considered as standard of care, is commonly available but are less frequently used routinely. Dental magnifying loupes are with low magnification. However, its use is common due to low price and easy to use. Randomized clinical trials, comparing between these magnifying devices for precision and root canal treatment outcome is the need of the hour. Conventional Endodontic therapy and surgical endodontics should apply magnification devices to be used in clinical practice routinely.