Background There are conflicting data regarding optimal treatment of non-culprit lesions detected during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD). We aimed to investigate whether ischaemia-driven early invasive treatment improves the long-term outcome and prevents major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods 121 patients with at least one non-culprit lesion were randomised in a 2:1 manner, 80 were randomised to early fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI (invasive group), and 41 to medical treatment (conservative group). The primary endpoint was MACE at 3 years.Results Three-year follow-up was available in 119 patients (98.3 %). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the invasive and conservative strategy, 4 patients (3.4 %) died, all in the invasive group (P00.29). Re-infarction occurred in 14 patients (11.8 %) in the invasive group versus none in the conservative group (p00.002). Re-PCI was performed in 7 patients (8.9 %) in the invasive group and in 13 patients (32.5 %) in the conservative group (P00.001). There was no difference in MACE between these two strategies (35.4 vs 35.0 %, p00.96). Conclusions In STEMI patients with MVD, early FFRguided additional revascularisation of the non-culprit lesion did not reduce MACE at three-year follow-up compared with a more conservative strategy. The rate of MACE in the invasive group was predominantly driven by death and re-infarction, whereas in the conservative group the rate of MACE was only driven by repeat interventions.

BackgroundThe number of cardiac rhythm device implantations has been growing fast due to expanding indications and ageing of the population. Complications of implantation were rare in the trials. However, these involved small numbers and selected patients. Prospective real-life data are necessary to assess cardiac device implantation procedure-related risks.ObjectiveTo determine the incidence and predictors of lead-related re-intervention in a Dutch high-volume teaching hospital.MethodsData from all patients who underwent cardiac rhythm device implantation between January 2010 and December 2011 were collected in a prospective registry. At least 1 year of follow-up regarding re-intervention was available for all patients. Lead-related reasons for re-intervention were categorised into lead dislodgement, malfunctioning or perforation.ResultsOne thousand nine hundred twenty-nine devices including 3909 leads were implanted. In 595 patients (30.8 %) a CRT-D/P was implanted. Lead-related re-intervention was necessary in 86 (4.4 %) patients; it was more common in younger and male patients, and due to either lead dislodgement (66 %), malfunctioning (20 %) or perforation (18 %). Coronary sinus lead dislodgement or malfunctioning was 1.4 %. Right atrial dislodgement (1.9 %, p < 0.001) or ICD lead dislodgement (1.8 %, p = 0.002) was more common than right ventricular dislodgement (0.3 %). The incidence of lead malfunctioning was higher (0.8 %) in ICD leads. An apical position of the right ventricular lead and lateral wall position of the right atrial lead were related to cardiac perforation.ConclusionsThe incidence of lead-related re-intervention was comparable with the literature. The majority of re-interventions were due to lead dislodgements, particularly with right atrial and ICD leads. Re-intervention due to coronary sinus lead dislodgement was rare.

Use of Evolution for lead extractions seems to be safe and effective, with a high clinical success rate.

Use of the novel Evolution R/L sheath vs. the original Evolution sheath was associated with significant higher complete success rates, without major complications and with a trend towards the reduction of minor complications.

This study was designed to test whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications could reduce the frequency of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The study was designed as an open-label, randomized trial. Patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery were considered eligible. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, on antiarrhythmic treatment, and those undergoing concomitant valvular surgery were excluded. The study was conducted in a single, university-affiliated community hospital. The researchers' role in the study was restricted to randomizing the patients and collecting data. The primary clinical care team made all decisions regarding patient care. One hundred patients were randomized to two groups: one received 30 mg ketorolac intravenously every 6 hours until able to take oral medications, at which point the patients were switched to 600 mg ibuprofen orally three times a day; the other group received conventional treatment. The primary end point of the study was incidence of atrial fibrillation in the immediate postoperative period. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 14 patients (28.6%) in the conventional treatment group vs. five patients (9.8%) in the ibuprofen group (p<0.017). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications were relatively safe and effective in significantly reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.