Background: Salivary gland neoplasms are uncommon in both pediatric and adult populations. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is one of the most common salivary gland tumors and usually presents with atypical clinical features. This study sought to evaluate the demographic and clinical factors affecting outcomes in adults and pediatric populations with MEC that could be used to risk stratification for treatment selection and clinical trial enrollment. Methods: Data on 4507 MEC patients were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database (2000–2018). Patients aged ≤ 18 years were classified into the pediatric population, and those older than 18 years were placed in the adult group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were created to analyze survival probabilities for various independent factors. Results: The pediatric population comprised 3.7% of the entire cohort, with a predominance of females (51.5%), while the adult population constituted 96.3% of the cohort, with a predominance of female patients (52.2%). Caucasians were the predominant race overall (75.3%), while more African Americans were seen in the pediatric group. In tumor size of <2 cm overall, poorly differentiated tumors with higher metastasis rates were observed more in adults (11.3% and 9.3%) than in the pediatric population (3.0% and 4.8%, p < 0.05). Surgical resection was the most common treatment option (53.9%), making up 63.6% of the pediatric and 53.5% of the adult groups. A combination of surgical resection and radiation was used in 29.8% of the entire cohort while a combination of surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy made up only 3.2%. The pediatric group had a lower overall mortality rate (5.5%) than the adult group (28.6%). Females had a higher 5-year survival rate in comparison to males (86.5%, and 73.7%, respectively). Surgical resection led to a more prolonged overall survival and 5-year cancer-specific survival (98.4% (C.I, 93.7–99.6) in the pediatric group and 88.8% (C.I, 87.5–90.0) in the adult group), respectively. Metastasis to the lung, bone, brain, and/or liver was found to have significantly lower survival rates. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that adults (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.4), Asian or Pacific Islander (HR = 0.5), male (HR = 0.8), poorly differentiated histology (HR = 3.8), undifferentiated histology (HR = 4.5), regional spread (HR = 2.1), and distant spread (HR = 3.2) were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary glands primarily affects Whites and is more aggressive in adults than in the pediatric population. Even with surgical resection, the overall survival is poor in the adult population as compared to its pediatric counterparts. Advanced age, larger tumor size, male sex, and lymph node invasion are associated with increased mortality.

Purpose: In this population-based study, we aim to identify factors that are influential on the survival outcome in MBC and investigate novel molecular approaches in personalized disease management. Methods: The data of this study were collected from the SEER database from 2000–2018. A total of 5315 cases were extracted from the database. The data were evaluated for demographics, tumor characteristics, metastasis, and treatment. Survival analysis was completed by using SAS software for multivariate analysis, univariate analysis, and non-parametric survival analysis. The molecular data with the most common mutations in MBC were extracted from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database. Results: The mean age at the time of presentation was 63.1 with a standard deviation (SD) of 14.2 years. Most patients were White (77.3%) with 15.7% Black patients, 6.1% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 0.5% American Indian. Histologically, most of the reported tumors were grade III (74.4%); 37% of the cases were triple negative (ER-, PR- and HER2-), whereas the hormone status was unknown in 46% of the cases. Spread was localized in 67.3% of patients while 26.3% had regional spread and 6.3% had distant metastases. Most tumors were unilateral (99.9%) and between 20–50 mm in size (50.6%). The lungs were the most common site for distant metastasis at diagnosis (3.42%) followed by bone (1.94%), liver (0.98%), and brain (0.56%). A combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy was the most common treatment with a cause-specific survival rate of 78.1% (95% CI = 75.4–80.4). The overall survival rate at 5 years was 63.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 62.0–65.1) with a cause-specific survival of 71.1% (95% CI = 69.5–72.6). Cause-specific survival was found to be 63.2% (95% CI = 58.9–67.1) in Black patients as compared to 72.4% (95% CI = 70.1–74.1) in White patients. Black patients also presented with higher rates of grade III disease, distant metastasis, and larger tumor size. On multivariate analysis, age > 60, grade III+, metastasis, and tumor size > 50 mm were associated with worse survival. The most common mutations in MBC identified in COSMIC data were TP53, PIK3CA, LRP1B, PTEN, and KMT2C. Conclusion: Though rare, MBC is aggressive, with poor prognosis associated with high-grade tumors, metastasis, tumor size over 50 mm, and advanced age at the time of presentation. Overall, Black women had worse clinical outcomes. MBC is difficult to treat and carries a poor prognosis that affects various races disproportionately. Continued enhancement of treatment strategies to foster more individualized care as well as continued enrollment in clinical trials are needed to improve outcomes among patients with MBC.

Background: Pancreatic lymphomas (PLs) represent <2% of all lymphomas and <0.5% of all pancreatic neoplasms. An accurate histologic diagnosis of PL is needed to predict prognosis and adequately treat the patient. This study aims to investigate the demographic, clinical, and pathological factors affecting the prognosis and survival of pancreatic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: Demographic and clinical data from 493 cases of DLBCL of the pancreas were identified between 2000 and 2018 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: The most common age group was between the ages of 70 and 79 years (27.0%). While 44% of cases involved distant sites (a proxy for secondary pancreatic DLBCL), regional and localized involvement was seen in 33%, with the most common cause of death being a primary pancreatic DLBCL. Most patients (71%) received only chemotherapy (systemic therapy). The overall five-year observed survival was 46% (95% CI, 43.5-48.3). The one-year and five-year survival with chemotherapy only was 68% (95% CI, 65.3-70.3) and 48% (95% CI, 44.7-50.5), respectively. The one-year and five-year survival with surgery and chemotherapy was 96% (95% CI, 91.3-99.9) and 80% (95% CI, 71.4-89.2), respectively. Surgery with chemotherapy (HR: 0.397 (95% CI, 0.197-0.803), p = 0.010) were both positive predictors in survival prognosis. Multivariable analysis identified age >55 years (HR: 2.475 (95% CI, 1.770-3.461), p < 0.001), distant stage (HR: 6.894 (95% CI, 4.121-11.535), p < 0.001), and undergoing no surgery (HR: 2.610 (95% CI, 1.307-5.215), p = 0.007) as negative predictors for survival. Conclusion: PLs are rare malignant pancreatic neoplasms with DLBCL being the most common histological subtype. An accurate and timely diagnosis of pancreatic DLBCL is necessary to implement effective treatments and reduce mortality. Systemic therapy (chemotherapy) with or without surgical therapy improved survival. Increased age and regional and distant spread negatively impacted survival.

Background: Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) comprises 6–7% of all salivary gland neoplasms and is the second most common salivary gland malignancy in children. Like many salivary gland carcinomas, it is considered low grade but occasionally it behaves aggressively. Understanding the risk factors associated with recurrence, metastasis, and death is important to determine the counseling and management of individual patients. Older population-based studies are presumed to have been confounded by the misclassification of other neoplasms as AciCC, in particular secretory carcinoma and cystadenocarcinoma. Since diagnostic tools to reliably separate these entities have been available for over a decade, reevaluation of epidemiologic data limited to the 21st century should allow a better characterization of the clinicopathological characteristics of AciCC. Methods: Our study extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for the period 2000 to 2018. Cox regression model analysis was performed to identify risk factors independently affecting survival. Results: Data for 2226 patients with AciCC were extracted from the database. Most patients were females: 59%, and white: 80.5%, with a mean age at diagnosis of 51.2 (SD ± 18.7) years. Most cases (81%) were localized at presentation. Tumor size was less than 2 cm in 42%, 2–4 cm in 47%, and >4 cm in 11%. Low-grade tumors had 5-year survival > 90%, whereas high-grade tumors had survival < 50%. Of the patients with known lymph node status only 7.3% had nodal metastases. Distant metastases were documented in 1.1%, involving lungs 44%, bone 40%, liver 12%, and brain 4%. The most common treatment modality was surgery alone: 63.6% followed by surgery and adjuvant radiation: 33%. A few received chemotherapy (1.8%) or multimodality therapy (1.2%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 90.6% (95%CI 89.1–91.9), and disease-specific survival was 94.6% (95%CI 93.3–95.6). Multivariable cox regression analysis showed that undifferentiated (HR = 8.3) and poorly differentiated tumor grade (HR = 6.4), and metastasis (HR = 5.3) were the worst independent prognostic factors. Other poor risk factors included age > 50 (HR = 3.5) and tumor size > 4 cm (HR = 2.5). Conclusions: In the US, AciCC is more common in middle age white females, and most tumors are less than 4 cm and localized at diagnosis. The most relevant negative prognostic factor was high tumor grade which was associated with higher hazard ratios for death than all other variables, including regional or distant metastases at presentation.

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an aggressive clinical nature and poor prognosis. With novel targeted therapeutics being developed, new ways to effectively treat PSC are emerging. In this study, we analyze demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of PSC and genetic mutations in PSC. Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were reviewed to analyze cases of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma from 2000 to 2018. The molecular data with the most common mutations in PSC were extracted from the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database. Results: A total of 5259 patients with PSC were identified. Most patients were between 70 and 79 years of age (32.2%), male (59.1%), and Caucasian (83.7%). The male-to-female ratio was 1.45:1. Most tumors were between 1 and 7 cm in size (69.4%) and poorly differentiated (grade III) (72.9%). The overall 5-year survival was 15.6% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 14.4–16.9)), and the cause-specific 5-year survival was 19.7% (95% CI = 18.3–21.1). The five-year survival for those treated with each modality were as follows: chemotherapy, 19.9% (95% CI = 17.7–22.2); surgery, 41.7% (95% CI = 38.9–44.6); radiation, 19.1% (95% CI = 15.1–23.5); and multimodality therapy (surgery and chemoradiation), 24.8% (95% CI = 17.6–32.7). On multivariable analysis, age, male gender, distant stage, tumor size, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, and liver metastasis were associated with increased mortality, and chemotherapy and surgery were associated with reduced mortality (p < 0.001). The best survival outcomes were achieved with surgery. The most common mutations identified in COSMIC data were TP53 31%, ARID1A 23%, NF1 17%, SMARCA4 16%, and KMT2D 9%. Conclusions: PSC is a rare and aggressive subtype of NSCLC, usually affecting Caucasian males between 70 and 79. Male gender, older age, and distant spread were associated with poor clinical outcomes. Treatment with surgery was associated with better survival outcomes.