ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pre-preparation technique (finger smearing and saliva ejection) of alginate impressions on the quality and accuracy of dental casts.Materials and methodsTwenty mandibular impressions from 20 patients (10 males, 10 females) with an age range of 20–40 years were recorded using stock trays. A standard impression and pre-preparation technique for alginate were employed. This included removal of saliva with saliva ejector, smearing of alginate on occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth and smoothing of the material in the tray (Group-1: Test) and no drying and smearing or smoothing of the material prior to impression (Group-2: Control). Standardized disinfection, storage, pouring and removal from die stone techniques were used for all samples. Surface defects (nodules/blebs) on the occlusal surface of casts as examined with digital microscope, were classified according to their sizes and surface area into; Type-A (<500); Type-B (>500 <100); Type-C (>1000) in micrometers (μm). Data was tabulated and analyzed by SPSS using Anova and Tukey’s test.ResultsDefects were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in samples in Group-2 (1225.51 ± 823.44 μm) as compared to Group-1 (783.68 ± 501.41 μm). All types of defects (Types A, B and C) were significantly higher in samples from Group-2 as compared to Group-1.ConclusionsUse of pre-preparation technique of finger smearing and saliva ejector prior to alginate impressions resulted in significant reduction of surface nodules/blebs and enhanced the quality and accuracy of fabricated casts. Therefore, the use of saliva ejector, finger smearing on the occlusal surface of teeth and smoothening of alginate impression, immediately prior to intra-oral placement is clinically recommended.

No abstract

Impact of tobacco smoking on oral microbiota-a case-control study.

Background: Dental implants are considered the first option to replace missing teeth. Alveolar bone resorption gradually progresses following tooth extraction leading to loss of vertical bone dimension for implant placement. The lateral window approach is the most commonly used procedure to treat vertical bone loss. Objectives: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the lateral wall thickness (LWT) of the maxillary sinus and determine the influence of gender and side on maxillary LWT. Methods: This study involved a cross sectional retrospective study. Cone- beam computed tomography data were collected from 99 patients with a total of 198 maxillary sinuses that met the inclusion criteria. The patient age ranged from 18 to 35 years. On the selected sagittal section, the points of measurement are determined by a perpendicular line at 5 mm from the lowest point of the sinus floor. Measurements were done at four different areas; first premolar (P1), second premolar (P2), first molar (M1), and second molar (M2). Descriptive statistics were used to calculate mean lateral wall thickness for each tooth, and student’s t-test was used to test the effect of gender and side on maxillary LWT. Results: The greatest mean LWT was observed around the left first maxillary molar (2.43±0.82), while the lowest mean LWT was observed around the right second maxillary premolar (1.62±0.61). There was no significant difference in the LWT around any tooth (M1 p=0.56, M2 p=0.92, P1 p=0.14, P2 p=0.19). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in both males and females of the lateral wall thickness in the left and right side of maxillary sinus.