No abstract

Rapid advancement in the domain of quantum technologies have opened up researchers to the real possibility of experimenting with quantum circuits, and simulating smallscale quantum programs. Nevertheless, the quality of currently available qubits and environmental noise pose a challenge in smooth execution of the quantum circuits. Therefore, efficient design automation flows for mapping a given algorithm to the Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) computer becomes of utmost importance. State-of-the-art quantum design automation tools are primarily focused on reducing logical depth, gate count and qubit counts with recent emphasis on topology-aware (nearest-neighbour compliance) mapping. In this work, we extend the technology mapping flows to simultaneously consider the topology and gate fidelity constraints while keeping logical depth and gate count as optimization objectives. We provide a comprehensive problem formulation and multi-tier approach towards solving it. The proposed automation flow is compatible with commercial quantum computers, such as IBM QX and Rigetti. Our simulation results over 10 quantum circuit benchmarks, show that the fidelity of the circuit can be improved up to 3.37× with an average improvement of 1.87×.

We propose a machine learning based approach to accelerate quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) implementation which is a promising quantum-classical hybrid algorithm to prove the so-called quantum supremacy. In QAOA, a parametric quantum circuit and a classical optimizer iterates in a closed loop to solve hard combinatorial optimization problems. The performance of QAOA improves with increasing number of stages (depth) in the quantum circuit. However, two new parameters are introduced with each added stage for the classical optimizer increasing the number of optimization loop iterations. We note a correlation among parameters of the lower-depth and the higher-depth QAOA implementations and, exploit it by developing a machine learning model to predict the gate parameters close to the optimal values. As a result, the optimization loop converges in a fewer number of iterations. We choose graph MaxCut problem as a prototype to solve using QAOA. We perform a feature extraction routine using 100 different QAOA instances and develop a training data-set with 13, 860 optimal parameters. We present our analysis for 4 flavors of regression models and 4 flavors of classical optimizers. Finally, we show that the proposed approach can curtail the number of optimization iterations by on average 44.9% (up to 65.7%) from an analysis performed with 264 flavors of graphs.

No abstract

No abstract