Percutaneous coronary angioplasty is increasingly employed in the treatment of patients with complex coronary artery disease. Different steerable guide wires used to open occluded vessel and facilitate balloon and stent deployment. However, the guide-wire itself is not without hazard: it may perforate or dissect the vessel, but fracture or entrapment is uncommon. Its management depends on the clinical situation of the patient, as well as the position and length of the remnant. In this review we discuss the angioplasty guide-wire fracture and entrapment risk factors, potential risks and management.
Troponins are regulatory proteins that form the cornerstone of muscle contraction. The amino acid sequences of cardiac troponins differentiate them from that of skeletal muscles, allowing for the development of monoclonal antibody-based assay of troponin I (TnI) and troponin T (TnT). Along with the patient history, physical examination and electrocardiography, the measurement of highly sensitive and specific cardiac troponin has supplanted the former gold standard biomarker (creatine kinase-MB) to detect myocardial damage and estimate the prognosis of patients with ischemic heart disease. The current guidelines for the diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction are largely based on an elevated troponin level. The implementation of these new guidelines in clinical practice has led to a substantial increase in the frequency of myocardial infarction diagnosis. Automated assays using cardiac-specific monoclonal antibodies to cardiac TnI and TnT are commercially available. They play a major role in the evaluation of myocardial injury and prediction of cardiovascular outcome in cardiac and non-cardiac causes. In this review we discuss the clinical applications of cardiac troponins and the interpretation of elevated levels in the context of various clinical settings.
TAVI is associated with a significant improvement in MR, especially in severe types. The lack of influence of MR improvement by the etiology of MR, the type of valve implanted, and the operative risk need to be confirmed in a larger multi-center study.
Despite the fact that CABG is the standard of care for patients with multivessel coronary arteries and/or left main stem stenosis, PCI has become a rival to CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease or left main disease. However, the need for repeat revascularization, in-stent stenosis and thrombosis remain the achilis heal of PCI. SYNTAX trial randomized patients with left main disease and/or three-vessel disease to PCI with TAXus stent or CABG with the concept that PCI is not inferior to CABG. At 1 and 2 years follow up, MACCE was significantly increased in PCI patients mainly attributed to increased rate of repeat revascularization; however, stroke was significantly more with CABG. The composite safety endpoint of death/stroke/MI was comparable between the 2 groups. Therefore the criterion for non-inferiority was not met. What we learn from SYNTAX is that multi disciplinary team approach should be the standard of care when recommending treatment in more complex coronary artery disease. SYNTAX makes interventionists and surgeons come together, it may set the benchmark for MVD revascularization. PCI and CABG should be considered complementary rather than competitive revascularization strategies. There is no substitute for sound clinical judgment that takes into account the patient's overall clinical profile, functionality, co-morbidities, as well as the patient's coronary anatomy. The SYNTAX Score should be utilized to decide on treatment of patients with LM/MVD. Patients with low and intermediate score can be treated with PCI or CABG with equal results. Those with high score do better with CABG. SYNTAX trial showed that 66% of patients with 3VD or LMD are still best treated with CABG. In the remaining 1/3 of patients with low syntax score, PCI may be considered as an alternative to surgery. Finally, medical treatment should be optimized in patients going for CABG.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.