Introduction: A diagnosis of an old inferior wall myocardial infarction (IMI) by computerized interpretation of a routinely performed electrocardiogram (ECG) may lead to further consultations and imaging studies to confirm or refute that diagnosis. This study was designed to assess the value of abnormal Q waves combined with repolarization abnormalities in inferior leads for the diagnosis of an old IMI as confirmed by imaging studies. Methods: Fifty-six patients, in whom computerized interpretation of the ECG resulted in the diagnosis of old IMI, and in whom imaging studies were also available, were included in this study. ECGs were interpreted using the MUSE-GE system. These ECGs were also analyzed by manually measuring the depth and the width of the Q waves and morphology of ST and T-wave changes in inferior leads. Echocardiograms and nuclear medicine cardiac imaging were performed and interpreted using standard equipment and techniques. Measures of accuracy were calculated and reported with 95% exact binomial confidence intervals (CI). Results: Computerized interpretation of the ECGs leading to the diagnosis of old IMI when compared with IMI confirmed by imaging studies, had a positive predictive value of 52.8% (95% exact CI: 35.5%-69.6%). Adding the manually measured Q waves wider than 40 msec and amplitude of-0.2 mV and repolarization abnormalities in leads II, III and aVF increased the positive predictive value of the test to 86.2% (95% exact CI: 68.3%-96.1%). Conclusions: These results suggest that the computerized interpretation of ECG results in a high rate of false positive readings of old IMI. Presence of diagnostic Q waves in inferior leads, if accompanied by repolarization abnormalities, improves the accuracy of the ECG for the diagnosis of old IMI.
Background: A diagnosis of an old Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IMI), on a routinely performed Electrocardiogram (ECG) often leads to further consultations and imaging studies.The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of Q waves in inferior leads, alone or in combination with repolarization abnormalities, for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction confirmed by imaging studies.Methods: Fifty-six patients, in whom computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram resulted in the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction, and in whom imaging studies were also available, were included in this study. Electrocardiograms were performed using the GE MAC-HD 5500. Electrocardiograms were interpreted using the MUSE GE system. Echocardiograms and nuclear medicine cardiac imaging were performed and interpreted using standard equipment and techniques. S AS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) was used to calculate 95% exact binomial confidence intervals (CI) for the population PPVs.Results: Computerized interpretation of the ECGs leading to the diagnosis of old inferior wall myocardial infarction when compared with inferior wall myocardial infarction confirmed by imaging studies, had a positive predictive value of 52.78%. Adding the criteria of Q waves wider than 0.04 ms, using manual interpretation of ECG, increased the positive predictive value of the test to 80%. However, the presence of ST changes and/or negative or isoelectric T waves, in the presence of diagnostic Q waves in the inferior leads, increased the positive predictive value to 92%.Conclusions: These results suggest that the computerized interpretation of ECG results in a high rate of false positive readings of old inferior myocardial infarction. This may result in overutilization of imaging modalities. Presence of diagnostic Q waves in inferior leads, if accompanied by repolarization abnormalities, improves the accuracy of the electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction..
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.