Objectives:To determine nanoleakage of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks bonded to dentin with self-adhesive resin cement.Methods:Eighteen sound extracted human molars were sterilized and sectioned into 3 mm-thick dentin sections. Trilux Cerec Vitablocks (Vita) were also sectioned into 3 mm sections, surface-treated using 5% hydrofluoric acid-etchant, and then coated with silane primer (Vita). Trilux and dentin sections were cemented together by means of three resin cements: Rely-X Unicem (3M/ESPE), BisCem (Bisco), and Calibra (Dentsply), according to manufacturers’ recommendations. Calibra was used in conjunction with Prime/Bond-NT adhesive (Dentsply), while the other two are self-adhesive. The bonded specimens were stored for 24h in distilled water at 37°C. Specimens were vertically sectioned into 1 mm-thick slabs, yielding up to six per specimen. Two central slabs were randomly chosen from each specimen making up the cement groups (n=12). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups (n=6), a control and a thermocycled subgroup (5–55°C) for 500 cycles. Slabs were coated with nail polish up to 1 mm from the interface, immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution for 24h, and tested for nanoleakage using Quanta Environmental SEM and EDAX. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests.Results:Rely-X Unicem and Calibra groups demonstrated no significant difference in the percentage of silver penetration, while the BisCem group revealed a significantly higher percentage (P≤.05). Thermocycling (500 cycles) did not have a statistically significant effect on the percentage of silver penetration (P>.05).Conclusions:One self-adhesive-resin cement demonstrated a similar sealing ability when compared with a standard resin cement. Thermo-cycling did not significantly increase dye penetration under the test conditions.

ObjectiveThe aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the performance of a self-adhesive flowable composite and two self-etching adhesive systems, when subjected to cyclic loading, in preventing the nanoleakage of Class V restorations.MethodsWedge-shape Class V cavities were prepared (4×2×2 mm [length × width × depth]) on the buccal surfaces of 90 sound human premolars. Cavities were divided randomly into three groups (n=30) according to the used adhesive (Xeno® V [self-etching adhesive system]) and BOND-1® SF (solvent-free self-etching adhesive system) in conjunction with Artiste® Nano Composite resin, and Fusio™ Liquid Dentin (self-adhesive flowable composite), consecutively. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n=10): (A) control, (B) subjected to occlusal cyclic loading (90N for 5,000 cycles), and (C) subjected to occlusal cyclic loading (90N for 10,000 cycles). Teeth then were coated with nail polish up to 1 mm from the interface, immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution for 24 hours and tested for nanoleakage using the environmental scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis X-ray analysis. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc tests (P≤0.05).ResultsThe Fusio Liquid Dentin group showed statistically significant lower percentages of silver penetration (0.55 μ) compared with the BOND-1 SF (3.45 μ) and Xeno V (3.82 μ) groups, which were not statistically different from each other, as they both showed higher silver penetration.ConclusionUnder the test conditions, the self-adhesive flowable composite provided better sealing ability. Aging of the two tested adhesive systems, as a function of cyclic loading, increased nanoleakage.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two hydrogen peroxide concentrations, commonly used in In-Office bleaching, on the surface roughness and color change of different esthetic restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc samples (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) of the different restorative materials used were constructed following the manufacturers’ instructions. Samples were classified into three main groups (n=20) according to the type of restorative material: Group1: Microhybrid composite Filtek P90 Silorane, Group 2: IPS emax Press and Group 3: Vitadur Alpha porcelain. Each of the three groups was divided into two subgroups (n=10) (a and b) according to the type of bleaching agent used (Opalesence Xtra Boost 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) and Zoom 2 25% HP respectively). Samples of subgroups were further divided into two equal divisions (n=5) according to the type of test performed (Roughness testing and Color assessment). Each sample was assessed for surface roughness and color change before bleaching so that each sample served as its own control. Surface roughness was examined using Environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM). Color measurements were made with spectrophotometer using CIELAB color scale. One sample from each subgroup was examined to confirm their crystalline phase before and after bleaching using X-Ray Diffraction. Results were statistically analyzed. Results: Significant differences in Ra values were observed between the unbleached and bleached samples, as well as between subgroups treated with Opalesence Xtra Boost and those treated with Zoom 2. The two bleaching agents had statistically significant effect on the color of restorative materials (P<0.05). Moreover, the color change was found to be significantly higher for the restorative materials treated with Opalesence Xtra Boost compared to Zoom 2, regarding their mean ΔE values. Conclusion: Highly concentrated in-office bleaching systems adversely affected the surface roughness and color of Filtek P90 Silorane, IPS e-max Press and Vitadur Alpha porcelain.