The Field experiment was conducted in a Randomized block Design (RBD) with three replications during Rabi, 2020-2021 at Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj. The genetically pure seeds of Mustard variety Pusa-21 were used for the study. The mustard seeds primed with botanicals and chemicals( Vermiwash, Panchagavya, Azatobactor, NaCl , KNO3, Neem leaf, Parthenium leaf and FYM) were subjected to  study in field experiment of growth and yield parameters were recorded. Objectives of the topic are to evaluate the Influence of bio fertilizer and organic seed treatment on growth, yield and yield attributing traits of mustard crop and to find out the suitable pre-sowing seed treatment  for mustard crop. Analysis of variance revealed significant mean sum of squares due to seed priming treatments. The highest germination percent (88.89),plant height (132.53 cm), number of branches(12.60 per plant),  yield attributing parameters in mustard as number of silique per plant (292.87), number of seeds per silique (18.73), seed yield per plant (17.73 gm/plant), seed yield  per plot (214.33 gm/ plot), biological yield per plot (443.15/ plot), seed yield per hectare (2143.33 kg/ ha), biological yield per hectare (5140 kg/ ha) and harvest index (41.69) showing better result when treated with treatment vermiwash 5 % for 12 hours. Remaining treatments i.e, treatment with panchgavya 5 % & 3 %, azotobactor 3 % & 2 %, NaCl  0.5 % & 0.1 %, KNO3 0.5 % & 0.1 %, neem leaf extract, parthenium leaf extract for and fym 2 % for 12 hours recorded the second most effective treatments and observed significantly superior. It  concluded that T8 (vermiwash 5% solution) found superior in all the growth and yield parameters.

The field experiment entitled “Pre-sowing seed treatment with organic and inorganic treatments on growth, yield and yield attributes of desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”variety (Pusa-362) was conducted during rabi at Field Experimentation Centre of the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India during 2020 - 2021. The experiment consisted of 13 treatments which was laid in Randomized Block Design (RBD). Results revealed that seeds treated with T9 (vermiwash 6% solution) recorded maximum values in growth parameters viz., germination percentage at 4,7,14 DAS with 10.833%, 44.17, 74.17%, plant height at 30, 60, 90 DAS with 16.60, 41.00, 53.80 cm Days to flowering (74.67 days), number of branches 6.93 branches per plant, number of pods per plant with 36.10 pods per plant, number of seeds 52.30 seeds per plant and pod weight per plant with 24.49 gm. Similar results were observed in yield parameters where highest seed yield per plant was observed in T9 (vermiwash 6% solution) with 30.35 gm and seed yield per plot 171.7 gm.

Interruptible rendering is a novel approach to the fidelity-versusperformance tradeoff ubiquitous in real-time rendering. Interruptible rendering unifies spatial error, caused by rendering coarse approximations for speed, and temporal error, caused by the delay imposed by rendering, into a single image-space error metric. The heart of this approach is a progressive rendering framework that renders a coarse image into the back buffer and continuously refines it, while tracking the temporal error. When the temporal error exceeds the spatial error caused by coarse rendering, further refinement is pointless and the image is displayed. We discuss the requirements for a rendering algorithm to be suitable for interruptible use, and describe one such algorithm based on hierarchical splatting. Interruptible rendering provides a low-latency, self-tuning approach to interactive rendering. Interestingly, it also leads to a "one-and-a-half buffered" approach that renders sometimes to the back buffer and sometimes to the front buffer. OverviewComputer graphics practitioners have long recognized the tradeoff between spatial detail and frame rates.Given additional resources, which is more important: more detailed models or higher frame rates? Answers to date have been ad hoc. Conventional wisdom simply dictates that high, constant frame rates are best; applications tend to target 30-60 Hz frame rates.Interruptible rendering provides a principled approach to this tradeoff by unifying spatial and temporal error in a single metric: screenspace distance (Figure 1). A coarse image is generated and continuously refined, decreasing spatial error while temporal error grows with the passage of time. When temporal error exceeds spatial error, there is no longer any reason to refine further: any improvement to the appearance of objects in the image will be overwhelmed by their wrong position and/or size. In other words, when the error due to the image being late is greater than the error due to the image being coarse, taking time for further refinement is pointless. The front and back buffers are then swapped and rendering begins again into the back buffer for the most recent viewpoint. A system which minimizes combined spatial-temporal error quite intuitively results in coarse, high frame rate display when input is changing rapidly, and finely detailed, low frame rate display when input is static. Interruptible Image Generation: As the name implies, interruptible rendering requires an interruptible image generation process -interruptible because a sudden motion by the user can drive up temporal error at any time. The back buffer should always contain a complete image ready to be displayed, with the rendering process incrementally refining the image until further refinement is pointless. This requires an interruptible, progressive image generation process. Depth buffered rendering requires a continuous LOD algorithm that preserves containment -refined versions of an object completely contain more simplified versions already render...

No abstract

No abstract