No abstract

Background Medical students often choose to pursue a career in Radiation Oncology with limited meaningful exposure to the field. We previously identified factors which were most influential to an applicant’s rank list order. Here we sought to assess if residency graduates had differing views regarding those factors. We also polled recent graduates’ attitudes of the current job market. Material and Methods An anonymous, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to graduates of radiation oncology residencies from 2003–06 and 2012–15 to assess the importance of factors with regard to residency selection, training, and job securement and attitudes toward the job market within the United States. Results Responses were received from 198 of 848 (23%) of those invited to participate. The respondents were divided into two cohorts for analysis, an “early” cohort (2001–09) and a “contemporary” cohort (2010–16) Respondents recalled “quality of clinical training,” “perceived happiness of residents,” and “sense of community among faculty and residents” as the three most important factors influencing the rank list; post-residency the most valued factors of the residency experience were “quality of clinical training,” “geographic location,” and “faculty mentorship.” Factors that were assigned the greatest differential value in hindsight to influence the rank list included “faculty mentorship,” “willingness of faculty to call employer,” and “quality of alumni base.” 64% of respondents reported the job market to be difficult or very difficult. This perception was more common among contemporary graduates (p<0.05). 60% of respondents reported “far too many” or “somewhat too many” residency positions for the actual job needs in the U.S. Conclusion After training, residency graduates place higher value on factors in residency that can directly improve job procurement. This finding is more common among more recent graduates, potentially a result of the perception of a tightening job market with too many radiation oncologists in training.

Background Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery. Methods A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student‐ and trainee‐led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre‐specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury. Results A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57–75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1–3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non‐selective cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Conclusion NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate a single institution’s experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treating malignant adrenal lesions, as well as the prognostic value of systemic inflammation biomarkers. Materials and Methods: From November 2007 to February 2018, 27 patients with malignant adrenal lesions received 31 SBRT treatments. Outcomes, measured from the date of SBRT, included overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and freedom from progression. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to identify potential prognostic factors. Tumor response was assessed with PET Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (PERCIST)/Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Acute toxicity was evaluated with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 criteria. Results: Median follow-up for all patients was 8 months. The complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 59%, 9%, 32%, and 0%, respectively. One-year LC, OS, and freedom from progression were 77.7%, 38.0%, and 10.0%, respectively. There was a trend toward significance upon multivariate analysis for pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >4.1 to predict inferior OS (adjusted hazard ratio=3.29, P=0.09, 1-year OS: 11% vs. 80%). There were 3 cases (10%) complicated by grade 2 acute toxicity, including nausea and fatigue. There was 1 grade 5 toxicity, as 1 case was complicated by a fatal gastric ulcer occurring 3 months after SBRT to the left adrenal gland (112.5 BED10). Conclusions: These results support the limited existing literature, demonstrating that SBRT provides adequate LC for adrenal lesions with minimal toxicity. Pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may serve as a prognostic factor in these patients.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.