Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis and adverse clinical outcomes among all breast cancer subtypes as there is no available targeted therapy. Overexpression of Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) has been shown to correlate with TNBC’s poor prognosis, but the contribution of EZH2 catalytic (H3K27me3) versus non-catalytic EZH2 (NC-EZH2) function in TNBC progression remains elusive. We reveal that selective hyper-activation of functional EZH2 (H3K27me3) over NC-EZH2 alters TNBC metastatic landscape and fosters its peritoneal metastasis, particularly splenic. Instead of H3K27me3-mediated repression of gene expression; here, it promotes KRT14 transcription by attenuating binding of repressor SP1 to its promoter. Further, KRT14 loss significantly reduces TNBC migration, invasion, and peritoneal metastasis. Consistently, human TNBC metastasis displays positive correlation between H3K27me3 and KRT14 levels. Finally, EZH2 knockdown or H3K27me3 inhibition by EPZ6438 reduces TNBC peritoneal metastasis. Altogether, our preclinical findings suggest a rationale for targeting TNBC with EZH2 inhibitors.

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 overexpression in solid tumors has been strongly associated with poor prognosis and adverse clinical outcome. However, blockade of CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling axis by inhibitors like Nox-A12, FDA approved CXCR4 inhibitor drug AMD3100 have shown limited clinical success in cancer treatment. Therefore, exclusive contribution of CXCR4-CXCL12 signaling in pro-tumorigenic function is questionable. In our pursuit to understand the impact of chemokine signaling in carcinogenesis, we reveal that instead of CXCR4-CXCL12 signaling, presence of CXCR4 intracellular protein augments paclitaxel resistance and pro-tumorigenic functions. In search of pro-apoptotic mechanisms for CXCR4 mediated drug resistance; we discover that DR5 is a new selective target of CXCR4 in breast and colon cancer. Further, we detect that CXCR4 directs the differential recruitment of transcription factors p53 and YY1 to the promoter of DR5 in course of its transcriptional repression. Remarkably, inhibiting CXCR4-ligand-mediated signals completely fails to block the above phenotype. Overexpression of different mutant versions of CXCR4 lacking signal transduction capabilities also result in marked downregulation of DR5 expression in colon cancer indeed confirms the reverse relationship between DR5 and intracellular CXCR4 protein expression. Irrespective of CXCR4 surface expression, by utilizing stable gain and loss of function approaches, we observe that intracellular CXCR4 protein selectively resists and sensitizes colon cancer cells against paclitaxel therapy in vitro and in vivo. Finally, performing TCGA data mining and using human breast cancer patient samples, we demonstrate that expression of CXCR4 and DR5 are inversely regulated. Together, our data suggest that targeting CXCR4 intracellular protein may be critical to dampen the pro-tumorigenic functions of CXCR4.

Heterogeneity within the tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) population limits immunotherapeutic efficacy against cancer. Between two subpopulations of exhausted CD8+ TILs (progenitor-exhausted, TPEX; terminally-exhausted, TTEX), TTEX cells remain unresponsive to anti-PD1 therapy. Deciphering whether and how PD1-resistant TTEX cells engage in tumor promotion could improve the response to immunotherapy. Here, we report that TTEX cells actively participate in tumor progression by modulating cancer stem cells (CSC). TTEX cells strongly correlated with elevated CSC frequency in poorly immune-infiltrated (CD8+ TIL low) advanced human breast and ovarian carcinomas. TTEX directly upregulated CSC frequency in vitro, which was not affected by anti-PD1 treatment. The TTEX-influenced CSCs were highly clonogenic and exhibited a multi-drug resistant phenotype, overexpressing drug efflux pumps like ABCC1 and ABCB1. These CSCs were highly invasive, displaying increased invadopodia development and elevated cofilin, CXCR4, and MMP7 expression. The invasive properties along with epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity of TTEX-educated CSCs increased metastasis in vivo. TTEX increased cell surface levels and activation of VEGFR2 in CSCs, and silencing or inhibition of VEGFR2 reversed the CSC-stimulatory effects of TTEX. LAMP3 and NRP1 on the surface of TTEX stimulated VEGFR2 in CSCs to promote aggressiveness. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that screening carcinoma patients for both CD8+ TIL and TTEX frequency prior to anti-PD1-therapy could improve patient outcomes. Additionally, targeting the LAMP3/NRP1-VEGFR2 axis could be a therapeutic strategy in advanced carcinoma patients with limited CD8+ T cell infiltration and high TTEX frequency.

In the German towns of Marburg, Frankfurt, and Belgrade in 1967, this single negative-stranded RNA virus was initially discovered. The importation of infected grivet monkeys from Uganda is what caused this virus-related sickness. As a result of the early link between viruses and non-human primates, this virus is frequently referred to as vervet monkey sickness. This virus causes Marburg hemorrhagic fever in humans and non-human primates. Human endothelial cells serve as the primary vehicle for replication. According to a 2009 report, the virus was being stored in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Body fluids, unprotected sex, broken or injured skin, and other bodily fluids are the main routes of transmission. After the incubation period, symptoms like chills, headaches, myalgia, and stomach pain start to show up. There is no specific medication for such an infection, only hydration therapy and adequate oxygenation are followed. The following diagnostic techniques can be used to confirm the diagnosis: (i) an antibody-capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); ii) an antigen capture ELISA test; iii) a serum neutralization test; iv) an RT PCR assay; v) electron microscopy; or vi) virus isolation by cell culture. Because MARV is a risk group 4 infection, laboratory staff must take strict precautions (RG-4).

No abstract