In patients on MTX, oral mucositis and fever can herald pancytopenia. MTX-induced pancytopenia is associated with high mortality. WBC at admission is the most important prognostic factor. There is need for increased awareness among physicians to minimize prescribing errors. A national guideline on monitoring of patients on MTX is desirable.
Introduction/Aims
We studied COVID‐19 vaccination‐related adverse events (ADEs) 7‐days post‐vaccination in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and other systemic autoimmune and inflammatory disorders (SAIDs).
Methods
7‐day vaccine ADEs were collected in an international patient self‐reported e‐survey. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression were performed.
Results
10,900 respondents [1227 IIMs; 4640 SAIDs; 5033 healthy controls (HCs), median age 42 (IQR 30‐55) years, 74% female, 45% Caucasian, 69% completely vaccinated] were analysed. 76.3% IIMs patients reported minor and 4.6% major ADEs. Patients with active IIMs reported more frequent major [OR 2.7 (1.04‐7.3)] and minor [OR 1.5 (1.1‐2.2)] ADEs than inactive IIMs. Rashes were more frequent in IIMs [OR‐2.3(1.2‐4.2)] than HCs. ADEs were not impacted by steroid dose, although hydroxychloroquine and intravenous/subcutaneous immunoglobulins were associated with a higher risk of minor ADEs [OR 1.9 (1.1‐3.3), OR 2.2 (1.1‐4.3)]. Overall, ADEs were less frequent in inclusion body myositis (IBM) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine recipients
Discussion
7‐day post‐vaccination ADEs were comparable in patients with IIMs, SAIDs, and HCs, except for a higher risk of rashes in IIMs. Patients with DM, active disease may be at higher risk, and IBM patients at lower risk of specific ADEs. Overall, the benefit of preventing severe COVID‐19 through vaccination likely outweighs the risk of vaccine‐related ADEs
Our results may inform future guidelines regarding COVID‐19 vaccination in patients with SAIDs, and specifically in IIMs. Studies to evaluate long‐term outcomes and disease flares are needed to shed more light on developing future COVID‐19 vaccination guidelines.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Aim: Henoch-Sch€ onlein purpura (HSP), a primary vasculitis, characterized by purpura, abdominal pain, arthritis and renal involvement, is predominantly a disease of childhood. However, rarely it can occur in adults in whom it is believed to be a more severe form with poor renal outcomes. We aimed to answer if the age of onset affected the clinical spectrum and renal outcomes of the disease in a north Indian population. Hence, we studied the differences in clinical spectrum and renal outcomes between adult-onset HSP and childhood-onset HSP.Methods: Case records of all adult patients diagnosed with HSP (onset ≥ 18 years) over the last 25 years in our department were retrieved. Data on clinical features, lab abnormalities and outcomes were extracted and compared with that in pediatric HSP patients (onset < 18 years) seen during the same period.Results: A total of 87 patients, including 30 adults and 57 children, were seen during this period. Compared to children, most of the adults had purpura as the first clinical manifestation (86.7% vs. 56.1%, P < 0.01) whereas abdominal pain was only rarely the initial symptom in adults (10.0% vs. 36.8%, P < 0.02). During the disease course, adults had a higher frequency of joint involvement as compared to children (90.0% vs. 43.9%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the frequency of renal involvement (60.0% vs. 50.9%, P = NS) and gastrointestinal involvement (66.7% vs. 84.2%, P = NS) between adults and children. Outcomes were good in both groups and most adults and children achieved complete recovery (83.3% and 86.0%, respectively). There was no difference in the frequency of immunosuppressive treatment required by the two groups. None of the patients developed renal insufficiency on follow-up.
Conclusion:Compared to children, adults with HSP seldom have abdominal pain as the first clinical manifestation while joint involvement is seen more commonly in them during the disease course.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.